VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
12.061
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
"Holidays" è un lungometraggio antologico che dà una svolta unicamente oscura e originale ad alcune delle feste più iconiche e amate di tutti i tempi, sfidando il nostro folclore, le nostre ... Leggi tutto"Holidays" è un lungometraggio antologico che dà una svolta unicamente oscura e originale ad alcune delle feste più iconiche e amate di tutti i tempi, sfidando il nostro folclore, le nostre tradizioni e le nostre supposizioni."Holidays" è un lungometraggio antologico che dà una svolta unicamente oscura e originale ad alcune delle feste più iconiche e amate di tutti i tempi, sfidando il nostro folclore, le nostre tradizioni e le nostre supposizioni.
- Premi
- 3 candidature totali
Art Campion
- The Man (segment: "Saint Patrick's Day")
- (as Peter Campion)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizSeth Green and Clare Grant play a married couple and are also married to each other in real life.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Minty Comedic Arts: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Cat's Eye (2018)
- Colonne sonoreGone Back Home Today
Written by Henry Stone
Courtesy of Henry Stone Music USA, Inc.
Recensione in evidenza
Horror anthology loosely organized around holidays, where each short is thematically related to a different holiday. The usual problem with these sorts of anthologies is wildly uneven quality, but in this case the quality is fairly consistent and reasonably strong. One of the many oddities of "Holidays" is that the worst short is the one by the most famous director included here, Kevin Smith. It seems like he wasn't even trying with his Halloween short and its disappointing that they gave the most on-topic holiday for a horror movie to someone who seems so disinterested.
Another oddity is that the first five shorts all have female protagonists, with only one being written and directed by a woman. It is almost immediately apparent which that is, not because it is appreciably better or worse than the others, but because of its attitudes toward its female characters, and the way it handles nudity (something that is mostly absent in the rest of the shorts). The fact that several films in a row all feature not especially strongly drawn or unique protagonists, some of whom are almost interchangeable, is a problem. The shorts are organized chronologically through the calendar year, starting with Valentine's Day and ending on New Year's Eve, but I think it might have been better to reorder them so that a sense of repetition didn't start to set in before there was some variation. The final short is actually the best, in terms of telling a compelling story with the most interesting characters we meet in the whole series. It is largely a two-hander and ends on a satisfyingly twisty note. And that brings up a third oddity -- all except the final short, and Smith's, have intriguing ideas, set-ups and situations that the various writers and directors seem unable to resolve in a very satisfying way. Some of them just end, some try for a conclusion that is perhaps meant to be ambiguous or disturbing, but they fail to stick the landing. Its strange to watch a bunch of short films in a row that share the same strengths and the same weakness.
I'd say most of the writers and directors represented here show promise, even if most of them don't quite deliver as fully as I'd have liked, and I look forward to more from any of these filmmakers. I don't know that I'll be returning to this collection of shorts anytime soon.
Another oddity is that the first five shorts all have female protagonists, with only one being written and directed by a woman. It is almost immediately apparent which that is, not because it is appreciably better or worse than the others, but because of its attitudes toward its female characters, and the way it handles nudity (something that is mostly absent in the rest of the shorts). The fact that several films in a row all feature not especially strongly drawn or unique protagonists, some of whom are almost interchangeable, is a problem. The shorts are organized chronologically through the calendar year, starting with Valentine's Day and ending on New Year's Eve, but I think it might have been better to reorder them so that a sense of repetition didn't start to set in before there was some variation. The final short is actually the best, in terms of telling a compelling story with the most interesting characters we meet in the whole series. It is largely a two-hander and ends on a satisfyingly twisty note. And that brings up a third oddity -- all except the final short, and Smith's, have intriguing ideas, set-ups and situations that the various writers and directors seem unable to resolve in a very satisfying way. Some of them just end, some try for a conclusion that is perhaps meant to be ambiguous or disturbing, but they fail to stick the landing. Its strange to watch a bunch of short films in a row that share the same strengths and the same weakness.
I'd say most of the writers and directors represented here show promise, even if most of them don't quite deliver as fully as I'd have liked, and I look forward to more from any of these filmmakers. I don't know that I'll be returning to this collection of shorts anytime soon.
- michael-3204
- 2 ott 2016
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Holidays?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Kì Nghỉ Kinh Hoàng
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Dublino, Irlanda(on location: segment "St. Patrick's Day")
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 55.621 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 45 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti