जमीन से पांच मील ऊपर और दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे, "फ्लाइंग फोर्ट्रेस" के रूप में जाने जाने वाले बमवर्षक के अंदर ग्यारह आदमी जर्मन लड़ाकों के अविश्वसनीय झुंडों से लड़ते हैं.जमीन से पांच मील ऊपर और दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे, "फ्लाइंग फोर्ट्रेस" के रूप में जाने जाने वाले बमवर्षक के अंदर ग्यारह आदमी जर्मन लड़ाकों के अविश्वसनीय झुंडों से लड़ते हैं.जमीन से पांच मील ऊपर और दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे, "फ्लाइंग फोर्ट्रेस" के रूप में जाने जाने वाले बमवर्षक के अंदर ग्यारह आदमी जर्मन लड़ाकों के अविश्वसनीय झुंडों से लड़ते हैं.
- 1 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 7 जीत और कुल 13 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाFlight scenes were filmed in replica B-17s using technology known as The Volume (used on The Mandalorian (2019)). The B-17s were suspended 50 ft in the air on a gimbal inside a 360-degree stage of seamless LED panel screens and ceiling. Actors could therefore react to flak explosions, crashes and planes flying in real time as the gimbal simultaneously reacted to scenarios.
- गूफ़Throughout the series the standard B-17F version is shown, but by early 1944 nearly all B-17s in the European Theatre had been upgraded to the B-17G version with the distinctive powered twin nose turret to help combat frontal assaults by the Luftwaffe.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 TV Shows of 2024 (So Far) (2024)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
After having anticipated this for years, I was rather hesitant to watch it initially because I had heard some mixed reviews and some of the early clips I saw looked very heavily CGI.
That being said, while definitely flawed, overall the series delivered fantastically and am glad that media like this is continuing to be made.
Some of the criticisms I've been reading in the reviews are the classic Brit/Euro inferiority complex non-sense you see on literally every U. S.-focused WW2 media. "We did stuff too. It's not all about the USA. Blah, blah, blah". Let's be honest. They saw the depiction of the RAF officer early in the series and instantly soured on the whole show. This is a mini series about the USAAF, NOT the RAF or some other Allied faction. You just can't tell that many stories and do them all justice. The scene in question represented a very real debate at the time and AGAIN, this is shown from the USAAF perspective. Any of these assertions that this was undermining the RAF's contributions or that the U. S.'s strategy was superior and morally better than the Brits' is just absolute non-sense and total projection.
Similarly, the whining about the "tokenistic" depictions of the the French and Dutch resistances, as well as the Tuskegee Airmen are unfair. This series already struggles by trying to tell so many stories in one overall piece; it would be impossible to fully delve into any of these topics in a 1 hour show, over 9 episodes. On top of that, if those groups weren't included at all, then that would have been criticized, as well. I applaud the writers for including them as best they could, although I will acknowledge that it was hard to follow every storyline and some seemed shallow or without real conclusions.
On the heavy use of CGI...I was worried that this would become a bit too distracting and make everything seem a bit fake, kind of like Midway, however, it just would not have been possible to depict the scope of the air war the way they did without it. Overall, I think it was pretty good, and you get some pretty amazing visuals that, to me, are worth it even if it's a bit much at times.
That being said, while definitely flawed, overall the series delivered fantastically and am glad that media like this is continuing to be made.
Some of the criticisms I've been reading in the reviews are the classic Brit/Euro inferiority complex non-sense you see on literally every U. S.-focused WW2 media. "We did stuff too. It's not all about the USA. Blah, blah, blah". Let's be honest. They saw the depiction of the RAF officer early in the series and instantly soured on the whole show. This is a mini series about the USAAF, NOT the RAF or some other Allied faction. You just can't tell that many stories and do them all justice. The scene in question represented a very real debate at the time and AGAIN, this is shown from the USAAF perspective. Any of these assertions that this was undermining the RAF's contributions or that the U. S.'s strategy was superior and morally better than the Brits' is just absolute non-sense and total projection.
Similarly, the whining about the "tokenistic" depictions of the the French and Dutch resistances, as well as the Tuskegee Airmen are unfair. This series already struggles by trying to tell so many stories in one overall piece; it would be impossible to fully delve into any of these topics in a 1 hour show, over 9 episodes. On top of that, if those groups weren't included at all, then that would have been criticized, as well. I applaud the writers for including them as best they could, although I will acknowledge that it was hard to follow every storyline and some seemed shallow or without real conclusions.
On the heavy use of CGI...I was worried that this would become a bit too distracting and make everything seem a bit fake, kind of like Midway, however, it just would not have been possible to depict the scope of the air war the way they did without it. Overall, I think it was pretty good, and you get some pretty amazing visuals that, to me, are worth it even if it's a bit much at times.
- branden-findeisen
- 6 नव॰ 2024
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Masters of the Air have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि56 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें