अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंFour couples meet for Sunday brunch, then discover they are stuck in a house together as the world may be about to end.Four couples meet for Sunday brunch, then discover they are stuck in a house together as the world may be about to end.Four couples meet for Sunday brunch, then discover they are stuck in a house together as the world may be about to end.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 3 जीत
- Public Radio Host
- (वॉइस)
- (as Will T.S. Coleman)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाTodd Berger based each character on various different stages of grief.
- गूफ़Glen calls the final book of the Bible "Revelations" instead of its correct name "Revelation". A Bible History teacher would never make such a mistake.
- भाव
Hedy: Do you think that when we die, we have to wear the clothes we died in for all of eternity?
Buck: No way. I bet we get those kickin' white robes like you see in the old cartoons.
Hedy: I look awful in white. Maybe Emma would let me borrow some sweats.
Buck: I bet you get a sweet-ass harp too.
Hedy: Hmmmm...
[scoffs]
Hedy: Do you have any idea how many human beings are estimated to have lived and died on Earth throughout all of time?
Buck: I have absolutely no idea.
Hedy: 106 billion.
Buck: Wow.
Hedy: Yeah. So what you're saying is that when we die we're going to a place where 106 billion people are sitting around playing the harp. That would be really fucking annoying.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe finale of Tchiakovsky's 1812 Overture is heard just as the ending credits begin. This is a callback to the beginning of the movie when Glen turns the car radio off just before this segment begins.
- कनेक्शनReferences The Lady from Shanghai (1947)
- साउंडट्रैक1812 Overture
Written by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky (as Pyotr Tchaikovsky)
Performed by The Apollo Symphony Orchestra
Courtesy of Partners in Rhyme, Inc.
You might not click with this movie right away, or at all, if you don't like the very ordinary style and very ordinary people this group of eight is meant to portray. I recognized too many of my friends, or friends of friends, in these clichéd types of people, and thought the acting and the situation very realistic.
Realistic within the bounds of a really funny somewhat absurdist comedy.
At first you have a gossipy parody of a weekend "couples brunch" where four couples converge, and have been regularly converging, to catch up and have fun. Except that secretly many of them really dread it, and there is some posing and whispering. As a viewer you enjoy the repartee, which is often pretty funny in a laugh out loud way, and you also try to figure out who is who, and whose is whose (the couples include at least one case of infidelity between them which complicates that part).
And I admit I might not have lasted an hour and half of this interplay, no matter how well performed. (To be emphasized, all eight are vivid and convincing in their own ways. It's the core of the movie that these are believable types.)
But you won't need patience once the huge (huge) twist comes along. It's a classic "ship of fools" scenario, and it's compressed into a very short space: a bunch of distinctive types of people find themselves trapped together in a crisis. That's just the interesting starting point, because it's how, exactly, those kind of people respond to crisis that makes it fascinating.
It works. We get to know the four or five most important people really quickly and when things shift and reactions mount--and the jokes keep flowing--you'll be right along for the ride. Some might call this a dark comedy since the backdrop becomes exceedingly dire, but the reality of that darkness is never salient. The humor, right to the very last three seconds, is cutting and bright.
Why, quite, this isn't a masterpiece is one of those amorphous mysteries of the movies. It lacks, I suppose, some sense of air, or of knowing-ness, or of a style that suffuses whether you quite realize it or not. Something about the very ordinariness of it all makes it wriggle in a sufficiency that keeps it from rising up, or getting really gritty. I don't think it's a flaw. It might even wear well over the years. But it makes some of the weaker characters and weaker lines glare just slightly.
See this? Yes! If you just hate the characters after ten minutes, you might give up. Even after the big twist about twenty minutes in the movie is very character driven. But if you sort of like their company and their humor, dive in and hang on. It's a hoot.
- secondtake
- 30 अग॰ 2013
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
- How long is It's a Disaster?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Bữa Tiệc Cuối Cùng
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $60,818
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $15,305
- 14 अप्रैल 2013
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $60,818
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 28 मिनट
- रंग