अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAn examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.An examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.An examination of the Battle of Gettysberg on both the personal and strategic level.
- 4 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 5 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
फ़ोटो
Peter Carmichael
- Self - Director, Civil War Institute
- (as Dr. Peter Carmichael)
Garry E. Adelman
- Self - Historian, Civil War Trust
- (as Garry Adelman)
Steven Knott
- Self - Instructor, U.S. Army War College
- (as Captain Steven Knott)
Edward L. Ayers
- Self - Author, The Crucible of the Civil War
- (as Dr. Edward Ayers)
James M. McPherson
- Self - Author, Battle Cry of Freedom
- (as James McPherson)
Josh Artis
- Colonel James Wallace
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Greg Berg
- James Wallace
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Anton Blake Horowitz
- General Carl Schurz
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Gary Green
- Union soldier
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Stephen Jennings
- Maj. Gen. George G Meade
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Charles Klausmeyer
- Amos Humiston
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- कनेक्शनFeatured in 2011 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys (2011)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I'm not going to claim that I am an expert on the American Civil War, however I am a lover of history and as such I've studied it quite closely. Before watching this "documentary" I read up on the battle of Gettysburg and watched videos made by the tour guides who work there.
It made me very interested to learn more and then found this "documentary". Figured it couldn't hurt to see it. Right? What met me was a disjointed, uninteresting, muddled portrayal of the events that took place at Gettysburg. You have Rebel soldiers dressed in rags, not uniforms. You've got people running all over the place pretty much never staying in any kind of formation. Not to mention all the things they get wrong both big and small in terms of history.
The cinematography is sub-par to say the least, the camera is constantly shaking, it's cut up to all hell, using slow-motion as well as extreme close-up shots WAY too much.
Even with them trying to focus on specific soldiers to portray whatever story they were trying to tell the whole thing is hidden by a 20 inch layer of vaseline.
I have no idea what they were going for with this. It's boring, disjointed and impossible to follow from start to finish. Whoever says that this is a good or great film/documentary clearly have no point of reference because this is EASILY the worst historical portrayal of any kind I've EVER seen.
Then again, what else should I have expected from a History Channel production?
It made me very interested to learn more and then found this "documentary". Figured it couldn't hurt to see it. Right? What met me was a disjointed, uninteresting, muddled portrayal of the events that took place at Gettysburg. You have Rebel soldiers dressed in rags, not uniforms. You've got people running all over the place pretty much never staying in any kind of formation. Not to mention all the things they get wrong both big and small in terms of history.
The cinematography is sub-par to say the least, the camera is constantly shaking, it's cut up to all hell, using slow-motion as well as extreme close-up shots WAY too much.
Even with them trying to focus on specific soldiers to portray whatever story they were trying to tell the whole thing is hidden by a 20 inch layer of vaseline.
I have no idea what they were going for with this. It's boring, disjointed and impossible to follow from start to finish. Whoever says that this is a good or great film/documentary clearly have no point of reference because this is EASILY the worst historical portrayal of any kind I've EVER seen.
Then again, what else should I have expected from a History Channel production?
- MeadeIndeed
- 22 अक्तू॰ 2017
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 25 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें