1956 - फ़्रांस. एक पुजारी की हत्या कर दी जाती है और एक बुराई फैल रही होती है. सिस्टर आइरीन का एक बार फिर शैतान नन, वालक से आमना-सामना होता है.1956 - फ़्रांस. एक पुजारी की हत्या कर दी जाती है और एक बुराई फैल रही होती है. सिस्टर आइरीन का एक बार फिर शैतान नन, वालक से आमना-सामना होता है.1956 - फ़्रांस. एक पुजारी की हत्या कर दी जाती है और एक बुराई फैल रही होती है. सिस्टर आइरीन का एक बार फिर शैतान नन, वालक से आमना-सामना होता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 12 नामांकन
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe movie was filmed at an actual abandoned church in France.
- गूफ़(at around 1h 9 mins) The painting of the nun is the same Patrick Wilson painted in The Conjuring 2 (2016), which is set in 1977, years after the events in this movie.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere's a mid-credits scene.
- साउंडट्रैकMoonlight Serenade
Written by Glenn Miller and Mitchell Parish
Performed by Mark 'Dr. SaxLove' Maxwell
Courtesy of Mark Maxwell Music
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
So, I was actually quite looking forward to this one. I wasn't expecting much from the original since sequels, prequel's and spinoffs often times are not up to par with their predecessors. However, I was quite pleasantly surprised with the first Nun and still think that it is a wildly underrated horror. So, after viewing this one, I must say that I was pretty disappointed. It was not a bad film by any means, but it did not live up to the quality of the first one and really landed in a very mediocre place.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
- Howling_at_the_Moon_Reviews
- 7 सित॰ 2023
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Nun II?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Nun II
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Couvent des Prêcheurs, Aix-en-Provence, Bouches-du-Rhône, फ़्रांस(boarding school interiors and cloister)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $3,80,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $8,62,67,073
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $3,26,03,336
- 10 सित॰ 2023
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $26,96,67,073
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 50 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें