IMDb रेटिंग
5.6/10
4.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
न्यू यॉर्क शहर में तीन मित्र चर्चा करते हैं कि किस तरह से सैन्य सेवा से बचा जाए, और वियतनाम, जेएफके हत्या, दर्शनरति, कंप्यूटर डेटिंग आदि पर.न्यू यॉर्क शहर में तीन मित्र चर्चा करते हैं कि किस तरह से सैन्य सेवा से बचा जाए, और वियतनाम, जेएफके हत्या, दर्शनरति, कंप्यूटर डेटिंग आदि पर.न्यू यॉर्क शहर में तीन मित्र चर्चा करते हैं कि किस तरह से सैन्य सेवा से बचा जाए, और वियतनाम, जेएफके हत्या, दर्शनरति, कंप्यूटर डेटिंग आदि पर.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
Tina Hirsch
- Tina
- (as Bettina Kugel)
Rutanya Alda
- Linda (Shoplifter)
- (as Ruth Alda)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाRobert De Niro's first credited feature film role.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनOriginal theatrical version was rated X. Some sexual material was cut to be re-rated R.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made (2004)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
In an episodic series of stories we meet three friends in the mid-sixties, each with their own hang-ups, issues and problems. Paul is shy and seeking love even though it isn't forthcoming from any of the computer dates he tries; Lloyd is a conspiracy theory nut, worried that he is being watched at all times due to his knowledge of those involved in the JFK assassination, meanwhile Jon is a shy amateur film maker who just happens to also be a peeping tom in training.
On the basis of those involved in this film I decided to give it a go and see what it did after all De Palma is mentioned in the same breath as other very good directors who did a lot of good work back in the late 1960's and 70's. However this film left me cold and failed to really make any lasting impression on whatsoever as it was rather messy and with nothing I could really get a hold of. Other reviewers have called this a satire but few have said what it satirises and I suspect are using the word rather than knowing that that is what this was. The episodic nature of the film was not the problem for me, it was more than few of the sections were funny or interesting and too many of them just seemed to go nowhere.
The cast are mixed and it is obviously the presence of De Niro that attracts a lot of people. He is good despite the material and he shows some touches that he would develop as time went on. Graham and Warden are underused and have nothing of any real value to offer not all their fault as the material is to blame but Graham does have some good moments. De Palma's direction is a bit dull to be honest and most of his shots are very static ignore the fact that it lacks the style he is famous for, this just lacks imagination full stop.
Overall this is interesting only to see early work from De Palma and De Niro but really as a film it is poor. The episodic nature of the film is not so much a problem as the fact that few of the episodes are any good, even if they are watchable in the main. Not really worth watching on the whole then but maybe completest will get something from it.
On the basis of those involved in this film I decided to give it a go and see what it did after all De Palma is mentioned in the same breath as other very good directors who did a lot of good work back in the late 1960's and 70's. However this film left me cold and failed to really make any lasting impression on whatsoever as it was rather messy and with nothing I could really get a hold of. Other reviewers have called this a satire but few have said what it satirises and I suspect are using the word rather than knowing that that is what this was. The episodic nature of the film was not the problem for me, it was more than few of the sections were funny or interesting and too many of them just seemed to go nowhere.
The cast are mixed and it is obviously the presence of De Niro that attracts a lot of people. He is good despite the material and he shows some touches that he would develop as time went on. Graham and Warden are underused and have nothing of any real value to offer not all their fault as the material is to blame but Graham does have some good moments. De Palma's direction is a bit dull to be honest and most of his shots are very static ignore the fact that it lacks the style he is famous for, this just lacks imagination full stop.
Overall this is interesting only to see early work from De Palma and De Niro but really as a film it is poor. The episodic nature of the film is not so much a problem as the fact that few of the episodes are any good, even if they are watchable in the main. Not really worth watching on the whole then but maybe completest will get something from it.
- bob the moo
- 21 फ़र॰ 2005
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Greetings?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $39,000(अनुमानित)
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें