एक फैशन फोटोग्राफर अनजाने में एक पार्क में दो प्रेमियों का पीछा करने के बाद फिल्म पर एक मौत को कैप्चर करता है।एक फैशन फोटोग्राफर अनजाने में एक पार्क में दो प्रेमियों का पीछा करने के बाद फिल्म पर एक मौत को कैप्चर करता है।एक फैशन फोटोग्राफर अनजाने में एक पार्क में दो प्रेमियों का पीछा करने के बाद फिल्म पर एक मौत को कैप्चर करता है।
- 2 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 8 जीत और कुल 9 नामांकन
Veruschka von Lehndorff
- Verushka
- (as Verushka)
Jeff Beck
- Self - The Yardbirds
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Roy Beck
- Boy dancing In Ricki Tick Club
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Charlie Bird
- Homeless Man
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Susan Brodrick
- Antique shop owner
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Robin Burns
- Homeless Man
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Tsai Chin
- Thomas's receptionist
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Julio Cortázar
- Homeless Man
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Chris Dreja
- Self - The Yardbirds
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAmong the homeless men whose photos were taken by the David Hemmings character is Julio Cortázar, who wrote the original short story on which "Blow-Up (1966)" is based.
- गूफ़When Thomas is frolicking with the two girls on the purple paper backdrop in the studio, two crew members, including a camera operator, can be seen just sitting there in the top right side of the frame.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनSome of the music was rescored for the Warner DVD release, namely the latter part of the opening title music. The VHS releases' music remain intact.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Film Review: How I Learned to Live with Being a Star (1967)
- साउंडट्रैकMain Title (Blow-Up)
Written and Performed by Herbie Hancock
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Antonioni was not a director that worried too much about people completely understanding his films. In fact I'd bet that he actually hoped they didn't understand everything. So I did not find it strange or surprising when after finishing the movie I felt quite confused. But the movie made me think for a very long time, which in my opinion is what a good film should do. There are so many aspects to this film that if you give them a chance and think about them, they will keep you reeling for hours on possible interpretations. The first and probably most important aspect of this film dealt with love. From what I have seen of his films, love is Antonioni's favorite subject. But this love was different than that of past films; it is much more shallow and un-centered. Thomas, the photographer, is surrounded by women, he goes from one to the next without thinking twice, treating them like dogs the entire time. But he can do this and get away with it because he is a famous photographer and can make the women what they all desperately want to be, Beautiful. For The first half of the movie I honestly did not like his character whatsoever. Whereas in the past the director has chosen mainly to explore the ups and downs of married life, or the problems of being hopelessly devoted to one person, he now points the camera at the single, care free, over sexed, youth of the sixties. Half an hour into the movie I found myself wondering what the heart of the film was going to be. We were introduced to Thomas and his world, but there seemed to be no conflict driving the story forward. Then came the quasi-murder mystery. This is what is really interesting and unique about this film in my opinion. Antonioni for a while leads us to believe that the movie is going to turn into some suspense thriller, or murder mystery, but never seems to quite get there. He has all the elements ready to go, but never follows through with them. He introduces this alluring and mysterious woman who is in on the murder and then never brings her back. The murder victim is discovered, but his identity is never revealed, nor a motive given for his murder. Thomas, after a very energetic and exciting photo investigation seems to not really care too much as to what happens with the investigations results, only telling a couple of his friends who couldn't care less. Antonioni seems to have used this whole murder mystery convention as some sort of glue to hold the rest of the real story together. The story of a mindless, beauty obsessed, celebrity idolizing, drug addicted, and violence obsessed culture. Probably my favorite scene in the film is after fighting over the piece of broken guitar with the other fans; Thomas just discards his prize as garbage. Something that kept bugging me was the antique shop. I kept wondering what in the world it had to do with anything in the movie; it stuck out like a sore thumb. But I knew it that there was some major purpose or explanation for its existence in the film, and then it just kind of clicked. Upon his first entry into the Antique store Thomas encounters an angry old man who we eventually find out is not the stores real owner, the true owner is a beautiful young woman who is planning to sell the old place and travel the world in search of something new. All this stuff she owns, the gold of past cultures, is old and useless now. She has a hard time making a living because nobody wants the stuff any longer. Here is where I think Antonioni's major message is hidden: That is the way life is, it moves on constantly, things change, people die, cultures evolve and the only thing that remains in the end is nature itself. Antonioni finishes the film beautifully, Thomas stands alone in a large field of grass, the only thing heard is the wind and the trees, as the camera backs away slowly, he disappears leaving nothing but the grass blowing in the wind, for like all the antiques and all the people that created them in the past, eventually Thomas's life will end and so will the current popular culture in which he takes part. Change is life's only constant.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Blow-Up?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Blowup
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Maryon Park, Woolwich Road, Charlton, लंदन, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(scenes where Thomas first photographs Jane and where mime artists play tennis at the end)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $18,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $38,575
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 51 मिनट
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें