जब एक शाही परिवार के सदस्य, एक दुष्ट परी का अनादर करते हैं, तो परी शाही परिवार की राजकुमारी को एक श्राप दे देती है. इस श्राप को सिर्फ़ एक राजकुमार ही तीन अच्छी परियों की मदद से तोड़ सकता है.जब एक शाही परिवार के सदस्य, एक दुष्ट परी का अनादर करते हैं, तो परी शाही परिवार की राजकुमारी को एक श्राप दे देती है. इस श्राप को सिर्फ़ एक राजकुमार ही तीन अच्छी परियों की मदद से तोड़ सकता है.जब एक शाही परिवार के सदस्य, एक दुष्ट परी का अनादर करते हैं, तो परी शाही परिवार की राजकुमारी को एक श्राप दे देती है. इस श्राप को सिर्फ़ एक राजकुमार ही तीन अच्छी परियों की मदद से तोड़ सकता है.
- 1 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 3 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
Eleanor Audley
- Maleficent
- (वॉइस)
Verna Felton
- Flora
- (वॉइस)
- …
Barbara Jo Allen
- Fauna
- (वॉइस)
Taylor Holmes
- King Stefan
- (वॉइस)
Bill Thompson
- King Hubert
- (वॉइस)
Bob Amsberry
- Maleficent's Goon
- (वॉइस)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Billy Bletcher
- Maleficent's Goon
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Candy Candido
- Maleficent's Goon
- (वॉइस)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Pinto Colvig
- Maleficent's Goon
- (वॉइस)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Hans Conried
- Lord Duke
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Dal McKennon
- Owl
- (वॉइस)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- …
Marvin Miller
- Narrator
- (वॉइस)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Clarence Nash
- Horse
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Purv Pullen
- Bluebird
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- …
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe running gag of Flora and Merryweather arguing about whether Aurora's dress should be pink or blue originated from the filmmakers' problem as to deciding just that.
- गूफ़King Hubert and Prince Phillip both remark at certain points in the movie that it's the 14th century. In another scene, we see fireworks being set off. Fireworks were not used for entertainment until the 16th century.
- भाव
Merryweather: [after Flora makes the first version of Aurora's dress] It looks awful.
Flora: That's because it's on you, dear.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe opening credits say Technirama, but not Super Technirama 70, which is the process it was filmed in.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनAt one point, the Swedish version was slightly edited to remove Prince Phillip hitting the Dragon's snout with his sword, as it was deemed too violent for Swedish children and also not motivated enough. It was eventually restored.
- कनेक्शनEdited into Disneyland: Music for Everybody (1966)
- साउंडट्रैकHail to the Princess Aurora
(1958) (uncredited)
Music by George Bruns
Lyrics by Tom Adair
Performed by Chorus
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I'm sure I've seen this film before but for the life of me I cannot remember when. Perhaps I saw it when I was very young and not since but it is equally like that my "memory" of it has just been created by cultural reference points, clips and a general knowledge that it exists. Either way when I sat to watch this the other day as a man in his mid-30's it did very much feel like I was coming to the total film for the first time and I was quite surprised by how simply it engaged and entertained me.
The plot is simple and will be known to all and within this telling we do pretty much go from one bit to the next with little in the way of extrapolation or development – a potential problem for older viewers looking to get into it, but it still manages to work. A big part of this is the sense of fairy tale that it delivers, because it puts you in a frame of mind suitable for this. The "opening on a shot of a book" start to this film has been done since many times so it is easy to overlook how effective it can be, but here it works very well and the whole film captures the feel that this opening is suggesting. The telling is lightly comic but avoids cynicism or cruel humour and instead goes for a light touch; although I do love the edge that modern cynicism gives to some films, I will concede that it was quite refreshing to have a film free of it. The broad strokes of a fairy tale are here – the good fairies are non-threatening and comic while the evil fairy is tall, lean, strict and menacing; the prince is handsome, the princess stunning etc and it does feel like being read to as a child because it is simple yet vivid in the way it is told.
It is easy (and tempting) to look at the film with a cynical modern eye and criticise it for its presentation of beauty and its gender politics but, while I do believe that things like this film and Barbie and others had a major role in shaping the view of beauty, it is not a thought that occurred to me once while watching the film. Instead it charmed me to its agenda, not my own and I would suggest anyone watching this and muttering their way through it has simply not come with an open mind. The voice work perhaps lacks the character of modern animated films, but all are good in their various roles – in particular the evil fairy is strong in her presence.
Overall Sleeping Beauty is considered a classic and it is so for good reason – because it is. It is the type of film that parents will want their children to see because it is simple, engaging, well presented, beautiful to look at and tells a story that has danger and evil in it while also showing the power of love and that good will always prevail. Of course this is not true – but this is a fairy tale and it takes you with it while you watch. It says something that over 50 years after this was made that a audience of all ages can sit to watch this and all come away loving it. A delight.
The plot is simple and will be known to all and within this telling we do pretty much go from one bit to the next with little in the way of extrapolation or development – a potential problem for older viewers looking to get into it, but it still manages to work. A big part of this is the sense of fairy tale that it delivers, because it puts you in a frame of mind suitable for this. The "opening on a shot of a book" start to this film has been done since many times so it is easy to overlook how effective it can be, but here it works very well and the whole film captures the feel that this opening is suggesting. The telling is lightly comic but avoids cynicism or cruel humour and instead goes for a light touch; although I do love the edge that modern cynicism gives to some films, I will concede that it was quite refreshing to have a film free of it. The broad strokes of a fairy tale are here – the good fairies are non-threatening and comic while the evil fairy is tall, lean, strict and menacing; the prince is handsome, the princess stunning etc and it does feel like being read to as a child because it is simple yet vivid in the way it is told.
It is easy (and tempting) to look at the film with a cynical modern eye and criticise it for its presentation of beauty and its gender politics but, while I do believe that things like this film and Barbie and others had a major role in shaping the view of beauty, it is not a thought that occurred to me once while watching the film. Instead it charmed me to its agenda, not my own and I would suggest anyone watching this and muttering their way through it has simply not come with an open mind. The voice work perhaps lacks the character of modern animated films, but all are good in their various roles – in particular the evil fairy is strong in her presence.
Overall Sleeping Beauty is considered a classic and it is so for good reason – because it is. It is the type of film that parents will want their children to see because it is simple, engaging, well presented, beautiful to look at and tells a story that has danger and evil in it while also showing the power of love and that good will always prevail. Of course this is not true – but this is a fairy tale and it takes you with it while you watch. It says something that over 50 years after this was made that a audience of all ages can sit to watch this and all come away loving it. A delight.
- bob the moo
- 5 फ़र॰ 2012
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Sleeping Beauty?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Uspavana lepotica (Trnjulčica)
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $60,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $5,16,00,000
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $5,16,00,485
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 15 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.55 : 1(original & negative ratio)
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें