Witness for the Prosecution

1957
U
1 घं 56 मि

IMDb रेटिंग

8.4/10

1.5 लाख

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

3,305

trailer प्ले करें3:09

1 वीडियो

99+ फ़ोटो

Legal Drama Legal Thriller Whodunnit Crime Drama Mystery Thriller

एक अनुभवी ब्रिटिश बैरिस्टर को एक हत्या के मुकदमे में अपने मुवक्किल का बचाव करना होगा, जो आश्चर्यचकित कर देता है।एक अनुभवी ब्रिटिश बैरिस्टर को एक हत्या के मुकदमे में अपने मुवक्किल का बचाव करना होगा, जो आश्चर्यचकित कर देता है।एक अनुभवी ब्रिटिश बैरिस्टर को एक हत्या के मुकदमे में अपने मुवक्किल का बचाव करना होगा, जो आश्चर्यचकित कर देता है।

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

IMDb रेटिंग

8.4/10

1.5 लाख

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

3,305

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

टॉप रेटेड मूवी #66

6 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 3 जीत और कुल 15 नामांकन

Court Officer
(बिना क्रेडिट के)

Don Ames

Bar Patron
(बिना क्रेडिट के)

Larry Arnold

Courtroom Spectator
(बिना क्रेडिट के)

Walter Bacon

Bar Patron
(बिना क्रेडिट के)

Eddie Baker

Courtroom Spectator
(बिना क्रेडिट के)

इस तरह के और

कहानी

बदलाव करें

क्या आपको पता है

बदलाव करें

ट्रिविया
Charles Laughton, who could be moody and difficult, was apparently a dream to work with, throwing himself into the role with dedication and delight. Billy Wilder later recalled a day that was set aside just for shooting reaction shots of the jury and courtroom crowd (composed of extras hired only for the day). Normally, the assistant director would read the actors' lines, and the extras would react. However, Laughton, who was fascinated with the whole process of filmmaking, begged to help. So he came in on his day off and read all of the off-camera speeches to the jury members. He not only read his part but also the judge's, the prosecutor's, and even Marlene Dietrich's. According to biographer Maurice Zolotow in his book "Billy Wilder in Hollywood", "it was an exhibition of craftsmanship such as Wilder had never seen. He believes that Charles Laughton had the greatest technical range and power of any actor, man or woman, whom he has known."

गूफ़
Whilst the story is set in London, the script contains several Americanisms such as "cot" for bed, "banana peel" for banana skin, "travel bureau" for travel agents, "roll up" for open, "movie" for film and "Scotch" for Scottish. Whilst some may be intentional, it is odd that Sir Wilfrid or Mrs French would use such colloquialisms. Conversely the US-accented Leonard uses the correct UK "quid" with reference to money.

भाव
Sir Wilfrid: I am constantly surprised that women's hats do not provoke more murders.

क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
As the end credits appear on screen, an announcer's voice is heard: "The management of this theater suggests that for the greater entertainment of your friends who have not yet seen the picture you will not divulge to anyone the secret of the ending of Witness for the Prosecution."

कनेक्शन
Featured in Marlene (1984)

साउंडट्रैक
I May Never Go Home Anymore
Music by Ralph Arthur Roberts
Lyrics by Jack Brooks
Sung by Marlene Dietrich (uncredited)
Reprised a cappella by Tyrone Power (uncredited)

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं384

समीक्षा करें

फीचर्ड रिव्यू

Superb and unjustly maligned film

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD!

I'm not sure I have the ability to adequately praise this film. The original short story(rather unremarkable, actually)has been expanded into a magnificent example of Hollywood entertainment at its best. In addition to perhaps the finest line-up of character actors ever assembled(next to Cukor's David Copperfield, that is), we get Laughton and Dietrich at the top of their form. The person who criticised Lanchester's performance as "annoying" missed the point entirely. Miss Plimsoll is meant to be annoying! Also, what's with all the bad-mouthing of Tyrone Power? "Hammy"; "terrible"; "worst performance ever". These are the perceptive IMDb reviews? Only one of you got it right: it's hammy because Leonard Vole is the one acting, not Power! For 95% of the film, the character is dissembling, only showing his true colors at the end. Of course it looks hammy: Vole isn't a born actor like his wife. And to all those know-it-alls who called this film mediocre and predictable, I look forward to your upcoming film projects which I'm sure will be paragons of excellence and worthy to be set alongside classics of the golden age.