अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA British politician finds that his intense liberal views become more conservative with his rise to power.A British politician finds that his intense liberal views become more conservative with his rise to power.A British politician finds that his intense liberal views become more conservative with his rise to power.
Seymour Hicks
- Old Buck
- (as Sir Seymour Hicks)
Tony Wager
- The Boy Hamer
- (as Anthony Wager)
Ronald Adam
- Radshaws' Doctor
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाUncredited theatrical movie debut of Honor Blackman (Emma).
- भाव
Hamer Radshaw: Did God ordain it, this contrast between sweat and ease, between want and luxury, or is it the product of man's will, of greed of selfishness?
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटOpening credits prologue: 1870
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
A politician from an impoverished background's life is examined, showing the battle fought and compromises made on the way.
This film is very loosely based on the life of Ramsay MacDonald, but there are significant differences too. It examines the conflict between idealism, principles etc and political pragmatism when the nation is in a state of crisis.
When this film was made Britain had just elected its first post-war labour government, arguably the most radical of the twentieth century. Politicians and citizens alike had largely put their differences aside during the war years and the nation as a whole was straining at the leash for change to occur. This film would have struck a chord with anyone who had any interest whatsoever in politics or the future of the nation. The plot of the film follows just one strand with little in the way of plot or character development outside of that. Michael Redgrave would have been about 38 years old when the film was made; nonetheless he manages to play a range of ages/stages from a young political firebrand to an elderly member of the establishment. It is in this respect one of his finest roles.
Today it is difficult to fully appreciate its political relevance so this film is probably best appreciated as something of a period piece, one for fans of Michael Redgrave certainly.
Seven out of ten from me.
This film is very loosely based on the life of Ramsay MacDonald, but there are significant differences too. It examines the conflict between idealism, principles etc and political pragmatism when the nation is in a state of crisis.
When this film was made Britain had just elected its first post-war labour government, arguably the most radical of the twentieth century. Politicians and citizens alike had largely put their differences aside during the war years and the nation as a whole was straining at the leash for change to occur. This film would have struck a chord with anyone who had any interest whatsoever in politics or the future of the nation. The plot of the film follows just one strand with little in the way of plot or character development outside of that. Michael Redgrave would have been about 38 years old when the film was made; nonetheless he manages to play a range of ages/stages from a young political firebrand to an elderly member of the establishment. It is in this respect one of his finest roles.
Today it is difficult to fully appreciate its political relevance so this film is probably best appreciated as something of a period piece, one for fans of Michael Redgrave certainly.
Seven out of ten from me.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Boulting Brothers' Production of Fame Is the Spur
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Denham Film Studios, Denham, Uxbridge, Buckinghamshire, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(studio: made at Denham Studios, London, England.)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 56 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें