Black Mirror: Bandersnatch

2018
18
1 घं 30 मि

IMDb रेटिंग

7.1/10

1.4 लाख

आपकी रेटिंग

Fionn Whitehead in Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (2018)

In 1984, a young programmer begins to question reality as he adapts a sprawling fantasy novel into a video game and soon faces a mind-mangling challenge. Welcome back. A "Black Mirror" event.

trailer प्ले करें1:33

5 वीडियो

99+ फ़ोटो

Drama Fantasy Mystery Sci-Fi Thriller

जब एक युवा प्रोग्रामर एक पागल लेखक के फंतासी उपन्यास को एक वीडियो गेम में बदल देता है तब वह वास्तविकता पर सवाल उठाना शुरू कर देता है.जब एक युवा प्रोग्रामर एक पागल लेखक के फंतासी उपन्यास को एक वीडियो गेम में बदल देता है तब वह वास्तविकता पर सवाल उठाना शुरू कर देता है.जब एक युवा प्रोग्रामर एक पागल लेखक के फंतासी उपन्यास को एक वीडियो गेम में बदल देता है तब वह वास्तविकता पर सवाल उठाना शुरू कर देता है.

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

IMDb रेटिंग

7.1/10

1.4 लाख

आपकी रेटिंग

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

1 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 5 जीत और कुल 11 नामांकन

ट्रिविया
A Black Mirror (2011) interactive film, in which the viewer chooses the plot direction multiple times. Although the listed running time is 90 minutes, this is approximate, depending how long the viewer decides to keep watching: most people can finish the story in one sitting of around 40 minutes, but this can be extended with 'do-overs', where an option is given to return to an earlier point in the story and make another choice. About 2.5 hours of footage divided into 250 segments was shot for the episode, with over a trillion unique permutations of the story (though many of those will be very similar). The total amount of footage included to make all of the film's possible variations work is 5 hours 12 minutes 13 seconds, as revealed by the film's BBFC classification.

गूफ़
Both of the programmers are seen to be working exclusively in ZX BASIC. By 1984, very few established software houses used BASIC as a coding language - most worked in Z80 assembler. Colin Ritman's games in particular showed a fluidity and responsiveness that would be very hard to achieve without the use of assembly language.

भाव
Colin Ritman: There's messages in every game. Like Pac-Man. Do you know what "Pac" stands for? P-A-C: program and control. He's Program and Control Man. The whole thing's a metaphor. He thinks he's got free will, but really he's trapped in a maze, in a system. All he can do is consume, he's pursued by demons that are probably just in his own head and even if he does manage to escape by slipping out one side of the maze, what happens? He comes right back in the other side. People think it's a happy game. It's not a happy game, it's a fucking nightmare world and the worst thing is, it's real and we live in it. It's all code. If you listen closely, you can hear the numbers. There's a cosmic flowchart that dictates where you can and where you can't go. I've given you the knowledge. I've set you free. Do you understand?

क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
In a few endings, once you finish the credits, a post-credits scene will play. Stefan would be seen on the same bus from the beginning, and plays a cassette called "BANDERSNATCH DEMO". The audio would just be some beeps and bleeps, but when translated using a ZX Spectrum Emulator, it gives you a QR code leading to the Tuckersoft website, found here: https://www.tuckersoft.net/ealing20541/

इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जन
There is no single narrative or version. There are five different endings, each with multiple pathways to them.

कनेक्शन
Featured in Jeremy Vine: एपिसोड #2.9 (2019)

साउंडट्रैक
Relax
Written by Peter Gill, Holly Johnson, Brian Nash and Mark O'Toole
Performed by Frankie Goes to Hollywood

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं1K

समीक्षा करें

फीचर्ड रिव्यू

5/10

Not as good as the hype on here would suggest

Despite the hype I see in the comments ("Mind Blown!", etc, etc) and the clever attempt by Brooker to make a multi-pathed story, the end result barely hangs together as a credible plot.

While it is fun to "control" the main character, the novelty soon wears thin and you come to realise you, the viewer/controller, just have the illusion of choice over what the character does when in actual fact you don't.

I suppose that is the point of the film, but it is hardly earth-shattering nor ground-breaking.

I'm giving this 5 stars for at least making a good attempt at a multi-path interactive film. However, as many who are raving about it now will see in time, it really falls far short of a good film. Novelty value can never replace a good story and a good story is something you will not find here.