Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA cute doggy with gypsy soul found temporary work in a creative environment.A cute doggy with gypsy soul found temporary work in a creative environment.A cute doggy with gypsy soul found temporary work in a creative environment.
Photos
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferenced in Obezyana straus i mogila (2017)
Commentaire à la une
'Kashtanka' (1952)
Opening thoughts: There were two reasons for wanting to see 'Kashtanka'. One was that it was made by Soyumultfilm. When it comes to Russian/Soviet animation, it doesn't get much better than Soyuzmultfilm, a studio that quickly became a personal favourite for nearly a decade. Their best work is visually stunning and have stories that are charming, imaginative and full of atmosphere with some memorable characters and when adapted enhanced by the visuals and often the music as well.
'Kashtanka's' other interest point was that it was based on a story by Anton Chekhov of 'The Cherry Orchard' and 'Uncle Vanya' fame, one that like 'Story of the Bass Cello' is one of his most accessible. 'Kashtanka' adapts the story wonderfully, it doesn't deviate too much while also being unmistakably Soyuzmultfilm in a good way. It is also wonderful in its own right, even if it is not one of the studio's best. It really is well worth seeing, and not just by Russians or those that speak Russian (studied it myself on my vocal and operatic studies course, and while it is a difficult language to get your head around it is a lovely language), but to a much wider audience worldwide and anybody that loves animation (like me) should seriously consider seeing it.
Bad things: Did find the ending on the rushed side, but that is the fault of the story itself (though the adaptation could have solved the problem quite easily). Something that has been a common criticism of it despite its mostly positive critical reception.
Good things: Everything else is fantastic. The animation can't be faulted. It is rich in colour and is filled with atmosphere and the drawing and designs are expressive, but it is the landscapes that are the star with the colour and attention to detail rich and meticulous throughout. Also found the music beautifully done. The lushness of the orchestration and atmosphere created is so unmistakably Russian in the best of ways.
Furthermore, the storytelling is very sweet without being sickly, and is also very moving and charming. The latter stages are moving. The characters are interesting, very endearing and easy to relate to, they are not the complex characters that Chekhov is known for but it is not that type of story.
Closing thoughts: Overall, wonderful.
9/10.
Opening thoughts: There were two reasons for wanting to see 'Kashtanka'. One was that it was made by Soyumultfilm. When it comes to Russian/Soviet animation, it doesn't get much better than Soyuzmultfilm, a studio that quickly became a personal favourite for nearly a decade. Their best work is visually stunning and have stories that are charming, imaginative and full of atmosphere with some memorable characters and when adapted enhanced by the visuals and often the music as well.
'Kashtanka's' other interest point was that it was based on a story by Anton Chekhov of 'The Cherry Orchard' and 'Uncle Vanya' fame, one that like 'Story of the Bass Cello' is one of his most accessible. 'Kashtanka' adapts the story wonderfully, it doesn't deviate too much while also being unmistakably Soyuzmultfilm in a good way. It is also wonderful in its own right, even if it is not one of the studio's best. It really is well worth seeing, and not just by Russians or those that speak Russian (studied it myself on my vocal and operatic studies course, and while it is a difficult language to get your head around it is a lovely language), but to a much wider audience worldwide and anybody that loves animation (like me) should seriously consider seeing it.
Bad things: Did find the ending on the rushed side, but that is the fault of the story itself (though the adaptation could have solved the problem quite easily). Something that has been a common criticism of it despite its mostly positive critical reception.
Good things: Everything else is fantastic. The animation can't be faulted. It is rich in colour and is filled with atmosphere and the drawing and designs are expressive, but it is the landscapes that are the star with the colour and attention to detail rich and meticulous throughout. Also found the music beautifully done. The lushness of the orchestration and atmosphere created is so unmistakably Russian in the best of ways.
Furthermore, the storytelling is very sweet without being sickly, and is also very moving and charming. The latter stages are moving. The characters are interesting, very endearing and easy to relate to, they are not the complex characters that Chekhov is known for but it is not that type of story.
Closing thoughts: Overall, wonderful.
9/10.
- TheLittleSongbird
- 23 nov. 2024
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée30 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Kashtanka (1952) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre