NOTE IMDb
6,9/10
2,9 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langue100 years of dreaming. 100 years of creating. 100 years of Stan Lee.100 years of dreaming. 100 years of creating. 100 years of Stan Lee.100 years of dreaming. 100 years of creating. 100 years of Stan Lee.
Kevin Feige
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Jack Kirby
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Julius Schwartz
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Flo Steinberg
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Warren Storab
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Roy Thomas
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Spiro Agnew
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Chadwick Boseman
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Kenneth Branagh
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
George W. Bush
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Charles Chaplin
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Bill Clinton
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Hillary Clinton
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Benedict Cumberbatch
- Self
- (images d'archives)
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 900: The Flash (2023)
Commentaire à la une
This movie, left me very disappointed because it failed to really describe the life of this iconic figure. While it carried the name of Stan Lee, the narrative seemed to be tailored to cater to the interests of the producers or the streaming channel publishing it rather than offering an in-depth exploration of the man himself.
I had hoped the film would shed light on the lesser-known aspects of Stan Lee's life, particularly the challenges he faced due to people taking advantage of him and attempting to claim ownership of his creative work. Unfortunately, these crucial elements were glossed over or omitted entirely, leaving a significant gap in understanding the man's life.
One of the best traits of Stan Lee was his kind and forgiving nature, which often made him overlook the harsh realities of the business world. This quality, while endearing, unfortunately made him vulnerable to manipulation by those driven by greed and self-interest. The movie missed a crucial opportunity to delve into this aspect of his personality, which would have provided a deeper appreciation of his character.
Stan Lee's contributions to the world of comic books and superheroes revolutionized the entertainment industry, yet his personal struggles with deceptive individuals were equally compelling. By neglecting to portray these challenges, the movie failed to give audiences a real understanding of the man behind Marvel.
Despite the movie's shortcomings, it did manage to touch on some positive aspects of Stan Lee's life, but that's all it was.
Stan Lee had the potential to be a compelling and insightful story, but it fell short by focusing on a limited and curated narrative. The movie did not do justice to the complex and multifaceted man that Stan Lee was, and it missed an opportunity to shed light on the challenges he faced and the impact he had on the world of storytelling and imagination. While it may serve as an introduction to Stan Lee's legacy for some, it ultimately leaves much to be desired for those who sought a more comprehensive and honest portrayal of the man who deserved better recognition for his contributions.
I had hoped the film would shed light on the lesser-known aspects of Stan Lee's life, particularly the challenges he faced due to people taking advantage of him and attempting to claim ownership of his creative work. Unfortunately, these crucial elements were glossed over or omitted entirely, leaving a significant gap in understanding the man's life.
One of the best traits of Stan Lee was his kind and forgiving nature, which often made him overlook the harsh realities of the business world. This quality, while endearing, unfortunately made him vulnerable to manipulation by those driven by greed and self-interest. The movie missed a crucial opportunity to delve into this aspect of his personality, which would have provided a deeper appreciation of his character.
Stan Lee's contributions to the world of comic books and superheroes revolutionized the entertainment industry, yet his personal struggles with deceptive individuals were equally compelling. By neglecting to portray these challenges, the movie failed to give audiences a real understanding of the man behind Marvel.
Despite the movie's shortcomings, it did manage to touch on some positive aspects of Stan Lee's life, but that's all it was.
Stan Lee had the potential to be a compelling and insightful story, but it fell short by focusing on a limited and curated narrative. The movie did not do justice to the complex and multifaceted man that Stan Lee was, and it missed an opportunity to shed light on the challenges he faced and the impact he had on the world of storytelling and imagination. While it may serve as an introduction to Stan Lee's legacy for some, it ultimately leaves much to be desired for those who sought a more comprehensive and honest portrayal of the man who deserved better recognition for his contributions.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Stan Lee?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 26 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant