NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
8,8 k
MA NOTE
Un couple britannique retourne à Paris de nombreuses années après sa lune de miel dans l'espoir de raviver son mariage.Un couple britannique retourne à Paris de nombreuses années après sa lune de miel dans l'espoir de raviver son mariage.Un couple britannique retourne à Paris de nombreuses années après sa lune de miel dans l'espoir de raviver son mariage.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 9 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFourth collaboration of Hanif Kureishi and Roger Michell. The story was developed in 2005 after a weekend trip to Montmartre, Paris.
- ConnexionsFeatures Bande à part (1964)
- Bandes originalesClair de lune [Suite bergamasque]
written by Claude Debussy
Performed by Naoko Yoshino
Courtesy of Philips Music Group (Netherlands)
Under liscence from Universal Music Operations Ltd
Commentaire à la une
I've only burned one book in my entire life, and it was a novel by Hanif K. At the time I had very little money to spend on non-essentials, and was so disappointed in his book that I wanted to get back the 14 $ I'd paid for it --utterly valueless--in some other form of entertainment. So I burned it in the fireplace.
I'd forgotten that until I saw this movie, scripted by the same author. Had forgotten how irritating his trite, lifeless dialog can be. I keep watching because the characters are so self-pitying and pathetic. They seem like they've been locked in a cave for 20 years and haven't had a real conversation in 30. Their relationship seems like a kind of awful prison. Real Philosophy professors are engaging, challenging, brilliant people...and they simply do not talk, think, or act like such insecure, lost milksops. (See the scene in Godard's Vivre sa Vie...there's a philosophy professor true to life)
Maybe its cathartic to hear one's deepest, most gruesome worst fears and thoughts put on screen like that. That is what Hanif does. Tabloid headlines made into dialog.
But its not art. Not what art should be, anyway.
Unfortunately I can't burn a film.
But Lindsay Duncan is beautiful enough to keep watching. It didn't cost me 14$. So its better than his book.
I'd forgotten that until I saw this movie, scripted by the same author. Had forgotten how irritating his trite, lifeless dialog can be. I keep watching because the characters are so self-pitying and pathetic. They seem like they've been locked in a cave for 20 years and haven't had a real conversation in 30. Their relationship seems like a kind of awful prison. Real Philosophy professors are engaging, challenging, brilliant people...and they simply do not talk, think, or act like such insecure, lost milksops. (See the scene in Godard's Vivre sa Vie...there's a philosophy professor true to life)
Maybe its cathartic to hear one's deepest, most gruesome worst fears and thoughts put on screen like that. That is what Hanif does. Tabloid headlines made into dialog.
But its not art. Not what art should be, anyway.
Unfortunately I can't burn a film.
But Lindsay Duncan is beautiful enough to keep watching. It didn't cost me 14$. So its better than his book.
- sharonlynnjoyce
- 2 mars 2014
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Le Week-End?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 10 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 225 098 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 43 608 $US
- 16 mars 2014
- Montant brut mondial
- 8 652 213 $US
- Durée1 heure 33 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Un week-end à Paris (2013) officially released in India in English?
Répondre