I came here to see whether the movie was worth watching or not, and then I saw the low ratings, but when I started to read the few reviews, I couldn't help shaking my head and begin doubting what I've just read.
I don't really know if the movie is OK or not, but judging for these reviewers' grammar and syntax, and the pride and conceit to explain things with the language skills of a three-year-old, making it so hard to understand anything they say, I'm wondering if perhaps these rudimentary viewers missed crucial moments in the movie, or if their lack of capability to convey a simple idea is proportional to that of receiving a simple concept.
So, all in all, the quality of the film remains unknown, so does the quality of the acting and the plot, yet, what is not unknown but rather evident is the unfortunate quality of its viewers, who don't even bother to check what they are about to publish.
I'm a foreign English speaker and I wouldn't be torturing people here if I weren't able to communicate my point of view. It's a matter of respect for the others.
Please allow me to introduce you to A. I. Say chatgpt. You can go there, write tour review in your own language, ask for a decent translation to English and voila.
