2050
- 2018
- Accord parental
- 1h 46min
Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.Un père de famille avec plein de problèmes dans sa vie découvre un salon caché qui offre une solution - des sexbots.
- Récompenses
- 16 victoires au total
- Georgia
- (voix)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesStefanie Bloom believes that many of the topics addressed in the film will be real before the eponymous year of 2050.
- Citations
Alli: If you control the people, you control the world. They tried everything they could to try to control us. Because they know we are emotional people. They tried to divide us by playing on our emotions. You know why, right? Because, if you keep the people emotional and angry you distract them from building their own financial empires and taking care of their families, and their family's families. I mean, think about it, bro. First you program people emotionally, right? Next you destroy their health. The best way to do that is through the food and water supply. I mean, Henry Kissinger snitched on the whole operation. He said, "If you control the oil, you control the country." "And if you control the food, you control the population." So now we've been programmed to rely on microchips more than we rely on each other. We no longer talk to each other, we only follow each other online, what? But this, this is the remedy. This is how we get back to our roots. This is how we bring humanity back to our essence, I mean, guys, oh. Just take this.
- ConnexionsReferences Les Jetsons (1962)
- Bandes originalesWhat We're Left With
by Konstantinos Lyrakis
As for acting: some really really bad, most slightly below average, and occasionally excellent. Same for directing.
The main companion robot was really good in her role. The others were fine. There was some unevenness in how the director saw their movements and expressions. Maybe he could explain it off as older and newer models. The companion to the main protagonist seemed more natural, but with a slight emptiness in the eyes. The other models felt very artificial.
And finally to what drags my rating way up to 7, which most wont agree with it deserving for good reasons. But I just had to give it some reward for a couple things it does very well.
It doesn't get too deep. It's not a complicated highly metaphysical issue. It's an issue we are currently facing, just in a different form. Devices. Loss of human contact and meaningful interaction. Inability to know how to interact.
On the flip side, they make the very valid point that we overcomplicate the meaning we give to sexual devices. Our social conditioning adds way too much subtext (you need the device or the roll play because Im not enough, you don't trust me enough, etc...).
Finally, there is a brilliant comment near the end (non-spoiler, it doesn't impact the outcome or story of the film). It involves releasing sterile insects into a population to help control or eradicate that population. A simple comment, but one the writers were brilliant to see and make the connection to sex bots.
So I don't want to over emphasize this film and say it's amazing. It's more of a film with a lot of lost potential. In the right hands, with the right director, and some cleaning up of the script and dialogue, it could be an excellent film. Not ground breaking, but good. But again, some people may find it too simplistic. I loved the simplicity.
And we certainly can't fault those who struggle to get through this film. They have good reason.
Last note: the ending dialogue is excellent, however, it ultimately ends flat.
- BarneyGrapes
- 20 mai 2022
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
- How long is 2050?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 46 minutes
- Mixage