NOTE IMDb
4,7/10
1,7 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.A shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.A shy, stuttering professor brings Aleister Crowley back to life.
Terence Bayler
- Professor Brent
- (as Terrence Bayler)
Geoffrey Breton
- Young Symonds
- (as Geoff Breton)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesChristina Chong and Gemma Hiles's debut.
- GaffesHaddo states that both Jesus and Samson from the Bible were Nazarenes. Though Jesus was a Nazarene (a person from Nazareth), Samson was a nazarite, which is a person who has taken certain vows in early Judaism.
- Citations
Haddo: Why do you not take my laws seriously?
Victor Nuberg: YOUR laws?
Haddo: "Do what thou wilt. Love is the law, love under will."
Victor Nuberg: Who is it you think you are?
Haddo: Victor, who is it you think I am?
Victor Nuberg: You are Oliver Haddo. H-A-D-D-O, Haddo.
Haddo: Oh, Victor, would you deny me thrice before the cock grows?
- Crédits fous[statement before end credits] On the seventh day the old king gave me a golden medal, bearing on one side the words ART IS THE PRIESTESS OF NATURE and on the other NATURE IS THE DAUGHTER OF TIME.
- the Chymical Wedding (1616)
- Bandes originalesChemical Wedding
Written by Bruce Dickinson (as Dickinson)/Roy Ramirez (as Ramirez)
Performed by Bruce Dickinson
Commentaire à la une
I want to like this movie more as it is connected to Bruce Dickinson.
I liked the concept and the basic story structure enough to make up for the massive flaws in this movie. I thought at times the movie was more gratuitous than it needed to be for no good reason... and I hate to say it, but the music was done poorly. That's not to say I don't like it, but that there were points in the movie where dialogue was impossible to understand because the music was louder. I also got confused at the end, but to be fair it's probably because the copy I watched was scratched during about three minutes- right at the climax of the movie.
I thought it was interesting though. The plot was well thought-out even if it was a bit scrunched. I liked all the references to occultism and quantum physics. If Bruce Dickinson writes another movie, I'll watch it... but I'll hope for better next time.
I liked the concept and the basic story structure enough to make up for the massive flaws in this movie. I thought at times the movie was more gratuitous than it needed to be for no good reason... and I hate to say it, but the music was done poorly. That's not to say I don't like it, but that there were points in the movie where dialogue was impossible to understand because the music was louder. I also got confused at the end, but to be fair it's probably because the copy I watched was scratched during about three minutes- right at the climax of the movie.
I thought it was interesting though. The plot was well thought-out even if it was a bit scrunched. I liked all the references to occultism and quantum physics. If Bruce Dickinson writes another movie, I'll watch it... but I'll hope for better next time.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Chemical Wedding?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 500 000 £GB (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 9 439 $US
- Durée1 heure 49 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le diable dans le sang (2008) officially released in India in English?
Répondre