Rookie Bookie

2005
1h 47min

NOTE IMDb

MA NOTE

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langue"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stak... Tout lire"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stakes gambling ring headed up by a corrupt hospital administrator. Before he can think twice,... Tout lire"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stakes gambling ring headed up by a corrupt hospital administrator. Before he can think twice, Joe becomes a bookie and gets in way over his head. As he desperately tries to get out of... Tout lire

Réalisation
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Scénario
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

5,7/10

MA NOTE

Réalisation
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Scénario
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Casting principal

1avis d’utilisateur

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Photos

Histoire

Modifier

Avis des utilisateurs1

Commenter

Commentaire à la une

4/10

Good acting, Bad directing

OK, I just borrowed this movie. The acting was fairly good considering it was an indie. Hadley(good emotion), Williams(despite a Tom Cruise look, did a good job transitioning from one part of the film to the other) and Bullard(natural talent) did a great job. Didn't like the ending, saw it coming. Besides the obvious holes in the story, I think it flowed well. Technically I thought it was boring, the camera didn't follow the actors (in some scenes they dipped out of frame for too long), there were no rolling shots (it was to confined, like the director didn't know how to make the camera move), lips didn't match ADR, the lighting was horrible, makes me wonder what film school these people went to? I gave it a 4 because of the acting, it's what held the film together. The actors deserved a better effort from the director.