Douze hommes en colère

Titre original : 12 Angry Men

Téléfilm
1997
PG-13
1h 57min

NOTE IMDb

7,8/10

19 k

MA NOTE

POPULARITÉ

Lire trailer0:56

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTwelve men must decide the fate of one when one juror objects to the jury's decision.Twelve men must decide the fate of one when one juror objects to the jury's decision.Twelve men must decide the fate of one when one juror objects to the jury's decision.

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

7,8/10

19 k

MA NOTE

POPULARITÉ

2 423

156

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Récompensé par 2 Primetime Emmys
- 7 victoires et 22 nominations au total

Anecdotes
Jack Lemmon was nominated for a Golden Globe for his performance, and lost to Ving Rhames. Upon winning, however, Rhames asked Lemmon to join him on stage and presented the award to him. Lemmon declared that the moment was "one of the sweetest in my life."

Gaffes
In the original 1957 script, the defense attorney is referred to several times as 'he'. In the 1997 script, the defense attorney is again referred to as 'he', but, in the opening scene of the 1997 version, the defense attorney who is sitting next to the defendant is a woman. The trial itself isn't shown, so it's possible they may have been talking about an additional male member of the defense that we didn't see in the film.

Citations
Juror #10: The kid's a punk, he don't even speak good English!
Juror #11: He doesn't even speak good English

Versions alternatives
The 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray, in addition to adding the extra opening Kino Lorber logo, plaster the MGM logo and closing MGM Television logos with the 2012 variants.

Connexions
Featured in The 55th Annual Golden Globe Awards (1998)

Avis des utilisateurs128

Commenter

Commentaire à la une

7/10

TV movie punches above its weight

Nothing about Sidney Lumet's "12 Angry Men" cries out for an update, yet here we are. And it's a pretty good one. And(!) somehow angrier than the original. A dozen character actors fronted by Jack Lemmon and George C. Scott (both ideal choices for their respective roles) and William Friedkin extracts terrific performances from just about everyone. As aesthetics go, it may not be as striking; then again, the handheld camerawork enhances the fly-on-the-wall vibe.

I think this sums it up best: in a bizarre dystopia where the original film no longer exists, this will do nicely. The fundamentals are still intact, the actors are new and interesting, and in that respect, it really does feel like a stage play.

Not bad at all.