Darkness

Titre original : Child of Darkness, Child of Light

Téléfilm
1991
PG-13
1h 25min

NOTE IMDb

MA NOTE

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is ... Tout lireA Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is which, with the fate of the world at stake.A Roman Catholic priest is sent out to investigate two alleged virgin births. One is about to give birth to the Christ, the other to the Antichrist. The race is on to determine which one is which, with the fate of the world at stake.

Réalisation
- Marina Sargenti
Scénario
- James Patterson
- Brian Taggert
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

4,6/10

553

MA NOTE

Réalisation
- Marina Sargenti
Scénario
- James Patterson
- Brian Taggert
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Photos

Histoire

Modifier

Le saviez-vous

Modifier

Anecdotes
The novel "Virgin" (1980) by James Patterson, which was the basis for this 1991 made for cable TV film, was later rewritten, republished and re-titled "Cradle and All" (2000) and then still later slightly rewritten and republished again in 2016 under the same title as the second version for Patterson's teen book imprint "Jimmy Patterson".

Gaffes
At one point in the film, Dr. Phinney claims to have thoroughly examined Margaret Gallager's vaginal tissue and that he has found it "totally undisturbed", from which he also claims that she has "never even masturbated". There is no medical test or examination that can give this result, so if he has done all of this, all that he has done is both carried out an invalid medical test and, essentially, sexually assaulted her. And we're supposed to trust this man?

Avis des utilisateurs18

Commenter

Commentaire à la une

Not a horror movie a HORRIBLE movie

This movie was pretty bad and took alot of effort to sit through. It's based on the book Virgin by James Patterson but only very loosely (the book is much better). As i understand it, this was originally a made for cable (USA network) movie..which explains alot. Not only was the plot pretty ridiculous, but i..being Catholic..found many of the scenes offensive. The premise sounds great (sort of a combination of Rosemary's Baby and The Omen) but the acting and the story were laughable. The only reason i sat through until the end was because i had read the book and wanted to see how far the movie deviated from the book. It deviated alot...and not in a good way.