Les pérégrinations de Tripod (Mlodzik), autrefois directeur d'une clinique dermatologique appelée la Maison de la Peau, le menent à chercher son mentor, le dermatologue fou Antoine Rouge.Les pérégrinations de Tripod (Mlodzik), autrefois directeur d'une clinique dermatologique appelée la Maison de la Peau, le menent à chercher son mentor, le dermatologue fou Antoine Rouge.Les pérégrinations de Tripod (Mlodzik), autrefois directeur d'une clinique dermatologique appelée la Maison de la Peau, le menent à chercher son mentor, le dermatologue fou Antoine Rouge.
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was shot without any sound recording because the 35mm camera made too much noise. The first-person voice-over and a few strange sound effects were added later.
- Citations
Adrian Tripod: When Antoine Rouge disappeared, soon after he had himself contracted the disease which bears his name, we believe that he had preferred to die alone, in an exile only partially self-willed. Still, he on one occasion remarked that Rouge's malady could not possibly be fatal to Rouge, though it had already killed hundreds of thousands of women. And it is true that his death was confirmed only by certain authorities who had long wished for his death. Yet the Rouge, as my mentor and I were preternaturally close, and I feel sure that he no longer exists...
- ConnexionsFeatured in On Screen!: Shivers (2008)
Similar in execution as "Stereo", with an upgrade from black and white into full colour, but still experimentally coping without sound, instead inputing odd disjointed sounds and a voice-over to convey the slightly misogynistic story. Rife with motifs featuring in Cronenberg's earlier works, like "Shivers", "The Brood" or "Scanners", this artsy feature remains an intriguing expansion of Cronenberg's cinematographic world-view. Despite a larger budget than "Stereo" and undeniably better technical resolution with some excellent framing of shots, "Crimes of the Future" is comparatively a step further into detrimental watching, making novelties like fast forward necessary to survive the viewing.
Nonetheless the overall experience remains an excruciating watch as a product of a student filmmaker, overawed by his own brilliance, but unaware that his supposedly nouvelle experiment in filmmaking is mostly unwatchable drivel. As such the style is almost unbearably self-defeating, making the story drown under the pretentious exposition and ultimate lack of direction. The script may sound cerebral (however truthfully strongly undercut by an intellectual overreach), but that does not excuse a total detachment from the viewing audience. Ultimately Cronenberg's venture feels overly childish in his introvert drive for novelty. Several scenes do manage to build a vague anxiety with it cold and distant atmosphere, especially the layered denouement involving a bout of paedophilia.
Best viewed for Cronenberg fanatics with a strong inclination towards understanding his perspective on film and exploring his growth as a filmmaker. Remaining subjects best resolve to focusing on his later works.
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Crimes of the Future?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Преступления будущего
- Lieux de tournage
- Massey College, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada(interiors and exteriors at the beginning)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 20 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 3 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1