NOTE IMDb
7,4/10
2,6 k
MA NOTE
Attirée par le succès, Aïda une jeune danseuse de province, se laisse séduire par les belles promesses de Marcello, un don Juan qui se lasse bientôt d'elle.Attirée par le succès, Aïda une jeune danseuse de province, se laisse séduire par les belles promesses de Marcello, un don Juan qui se lasse bientôt d'elle.Attirée par le succès, Aïda une jeune danseuse de province, se laisse séduire par les belles promesses de Marcello, un don Juan qui se lasse bientôt d'elle.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Gian Maria Volontè
- Piero Benotti
- (as Gianmaria Volontè)
Edda Soligo
- Teacher
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn 2008, the film was selected to enter the list of the 100 Italian films to be saved (100 film italiani da salvare). The list was created with the aim to report "100 films that have changed the collective memory of the country between 1942 and 1978". The project was established by the Venice Days ("Giornate degli Autori") in the Venice Film Festival, in collaboration with Cinecittà Holding and with the support of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage.
- GaffesIn the opening scene when Aida takes an emergency bathroom break in the ditch, there is a noticeable paper cup like white object in the middle of the road. It comes and goes and moves around.
- Citations
Don Pietro Introna: I'd like to talk.
Aida Zepponi: To me?
Don Pietro Introna: Yes, you. Where can we go? The museum, no one ever goes there.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Hep Taxi !: Claudia Cardinale (2017)
- Bandes originales'Celeste Aida' from 'Aida'
Composed by Giuseppe Verdi (as G. Verdi)
Sung by Beniamino Gigli
Courtesy of Ricordi
Commentaire à la une
I have news for you. Claudia, as beautiful as she is, is not the most beautiful person in this film. That would be Jacque Perrin. He was 19 when the film was made (his character is 16), and the camera lingers on him in scene after scene.
The story is simple: Perrin's character falls for Claudia. She's an adult, he's not. She's poor, he's nobility.
Perrin's understated performance is a dead-on portrait of adolescent longing. His eyes tell the whole story. It's difficult to imagine that any man could watch him without experiencing flashbacks to his own adolescence. He doesn't know whether to hope, or not, but he can't help hoping anyway. He doesn't know anything about adult courtship, so he improvises as he goes along. He's unfailingly, achingly, kind and polite (see first clause, previous sentence). He's brave, as he pushes against, and sometimes breaks, the rules that bind a young man not yet old enough to make his own rules.
Claudia, meanwhile, also provides a deeply thought performance, as a young woman whose poverty constrains her every move. She wants some tiny measure of security-- her fear of of the very real possibility of being out on the streets in palpable. She has no way to reach safety without depending on a man, but men have been awful to her. And, she wants desperately not to cross the final line of degradation and become a whore. She'll take money, but only if she can satisfy herself that it is a gift-- that is, only if she can feel that she still has some measure of choice in what happens next. Several men, including Perrin, are trying to "help" her. We see her hesitate, and calculate, in almost every conversation: trying to decide if the safety offered is real, calculating what she will have to give up if she accepts. Claudia is not in glamor mode here: she is beautiful, and the men are swarming around her, but her clothes are cheap, and she's living out of her suitcase.
This is a fine film, but it's not likely to be in anyone's top ten. I think most people will find it moving and well worth watching.
Why not a GREAT film? I think this is not so much because of particular flaws of the film, as because of its modest dimensions. The film is not trying to make a grand statement. It delivers deeply felt and moving drama, and two completely believable and interesting characters. Enough for me. P.S.: On the dubbed version, the voicing is surprisingly good.
The story is simple: Perrin's character falls for Claudia. She's an adult, he's not. She's poor, he's nobility.
Perrin's understated performance is a dead-on portrait of adolescent longing. His eyes tell the whole story. It's difficult to imagine that any man could watch him without experiencing flashbacks to his own adolescence. He doesn't know whether to hope, or not, but he can't help hoping anyway. He doesn't know anything about adult courtship, so he improvises as he goes along. He's unfailingly, achingly, kind and polite (see first clause, previous sentence). He's brave, as he pushes against, and sometimes breaks, the rules that bind a young man not yet old enough to make his own rules.
Claudia, meanwhile, also provides a deeply thought performance, as a young woman whose poverty constrains her every move. She wants some tiny measure of security-- her fear of of the very real possibility of being out on the streets in palpable. She has no way to reach safety without depending on a man, but men have been awful to her. And, she wants desperately not to cross the final line of degradation and become a whore. She'll take money, but only if she can satisfy herself that it is a gift-- that is, only if she can feel that she still has some measure of choice in what happens next. Several men, including Perrin, are trying to "help" her. We see her hesitate, and calculate, in almost every conversation: trying to decide if the safety offered is real, calculating what she will have to give up if she accepts. Claudia is not in glamor mode here: she is beautiful, and the men are swarming around her, but her clothes are cheap, and she's living out of her suitcase.
This is a fine film, but it's not likely to be in anyone's top ten. I think most people will find it moving and well worth watching.
Why not a GREAT film? I think this is not so much because of particular flaws of the film, as because of its modest dimensions. The film is not trying to make a grand statement. It delivers deeply felt and moving drama, and two completely believable and interesting characters. Enough for me. P.S.: On the dubbed version, the voicing is surprisingly good.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Girl with a Suitcase?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Girl with a Suitcase
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 5 236 $US
- Durée2 heures 1 minute
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Mexican Spanish language plot outline for La fille à la valise (1961)?
Répondre