Les portes de la nuit
- 1946
- 2h
NOTE IMDb
7,1/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIt's Paris in the winter after its liberation. A tramp who may also be Destiny predicts that Jean Diego will fall in love with a beautiful girl. That same evening, Jean meets Malou.It's Paris in the winter after its liberation. A tramp who may also be Destiny predicts that Jean Diego will fall in love with a beautiful girl. That same evening, Jean meets Malou.It's Paris in the winter after its liberation. A tramp who may also be Destiny predicts that Jean Diego will fall in love with a beautiful girl. That same evening, Jean meets Malou.
Jane Marken
- Mme Germaine
- (as Jeanne Marken)
Julien Carette
- Monsieur Quinquina
- (as Carette)
Brigitte Auber
- Spectatrice de la noyée
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe roles of Jean Diego and Malou were originally to be played by then-lovers Jean Gabin and Marlene Dietrich, who had recently returned to France after the end of the war. Dietrich pulled out of the project at the last minute, however, and Gabin followed her. With the rest of the cast already selected and production scheduled to begin soon, Carné and Prévert had to choose an unknown actor for the role of Jean Diego, a singer/performer who had recently had some success in the French Music Halls - Yves Montand.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Voyage à travers le cinéma français (2016)
- Bandes originalesLes Feuilles Mortes
Music by Joseph Kosma
Lyrics by Jacques Prévert
Performed by Yves Montand and Irène Joachim
Commentaire à la une
There's more than one reason to be utterly disappointed by this movie teaming Carné & Prévert & Trauner & Kosma again so soon after Les Enfants du Paradis.
Where to begin to describe this failure to follow up with the previous year's masterpiece? The characters are all wooden and no one has a story that gets the movie started. The best in my opinion is the character played by Serge Reggiani, the worst is the one played by Nathalie Nattier whose acting is horrendous. Anyway the love story between her character and Montand's is melodramatic in the worst sense. Montand is OK though but eventually he is as much at a loss as we are, trying to get through the story. As for the other characters they are quite colorful thus they get too much exposition which proves detrimental to the building up of a core narrative.
Sad misfire... how could they go so far downhill? I suppose it's the classic spell of bad ideas piling up to give a very bad result. A character embodying Destiny? OK that's poetic but the rest of the story unfolds in a very serious background: post-Liberation Paris with patriots and traitors casually living side by side. Some aspects are poetic, others just dead serious and the love story in between is simply stuck in a no-man's-land, non-existent. Very sad to say with the benefit of hindsight that they fumbled everything as if they didn't know how to tell a story: a love story lost in a deck of vignettes of varying interest.
Well, I'd rather think of what they could have done with the Montand character investigating in the underworld to find his fiancée or maybe escaping his fate, in line with Gabin's character in Quai des brumes. Or if they had made a dark comedy like Drôle de drame with people reuniting after the war, trying to know what each other did under German rule in order to find an upright (and innocent) new family leader to eventually hide their consciences (and ill-acquired fortunes) behind him.
Where to begin to describe this failure to follow up with the previous year's masterpiece? The characters are all wooden and no one has a story that gets the movie started. The best in my opinion is the character played by Serge Reggiani, the worst is the one played by Nathalie Nattier whose acting is horrendous. Anyway the love story between her character and Montand's is melodramatic in the worst sense. Montand is OK though but eventually he is as much at a loss as we are, trying to get through the story. As for the other characters they are quite colorful thus they get too much exposition which proves detrimental to the building up of a core narrative.
Sad misfire... how could they go so far downhill? I suppose it's the classic spell of bad ideas piling up to give a very bad result. A character embodying Destiny? OK that's poetic but the rest of the story unfolds in a very serious background: post-Liberation Paris with patriots and traitors casually living side by side. Some aspects are poetic, others just dead serious and the love story in between is simply stuck in a no-man's-land, non-existent. Very sad to say with the benefit of hindsight that they fumbled everything as if they didn't know how to tell a story: a love story lost in a deck of vignettes of varying interest.
Well, I'd rather think of what they could have done with the Montand character investigating in the underworld to find his fiancée or maybe escaping his fate, in line with Gabin's character in Quai des brumes. Or if they had made a dark comedy like Drôle de drame with people reuniting after the war, trying to know what each other did under German rule in order to find an upright (and innocent) new family leader to eventually hide their consciences (and ill-acquired fortunes) behind him.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée2 heures
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Les portes de la nuit (1946) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre