Lingaa
- 2014
- Tous publics
- 2h 54min
NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
6,6 k
MA NOTE
Un petit voleur se reforme après avoir appris le rôle joué par son grand-père dans la construction d'un barrage.Un petit voleur se reforme après avoir appris le rôle joué par son grand-père dans la construction d'un barrage.Un petit voleur se reforme après avoir appris le rôle joué par son grand-père dans la construction d'un barrage.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Vijayakumar
- Village Head
- (as Vijay Kumar)
K. Viswanath
- Village Head
- (as K. Vishwanath)
Ilavarasu
- Lingeswaran's Assistant
- (as Illavarasu)
Madhan Bob
- Settu
- (as Madan Bob)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLingaa name came from rajni's grandson "lingaa danush"
- GaffesLingeswaran character reads the book "The Hero with a Thousand faces" by Joseph Campbell, during train journey that is just before the fight sequence. This story is set in 1939 (before India's independence) but the book was originally published in 1949.
- ConnexionsFeatured in For the Love of a Man (2015)
- Bandes originalesOh Nanba
Produced by A.R. Rahman
Written by Vairamuthu
Performed by Aaryan Dinesh Kanagaratnam & S.P. Balasubrahmanyam
Commentaire à la une
First of all the movie has a brilliant plot, when it enters into Raja Lingeswaran's flashback. But why the movie has such a low rating and box office reception you ask, i'll tell you.
The movie is well cast. Especially Vijayakumar, who does a great job.
The movie falls mainly due to poor direction, cinematography, music and pretty much every technical department fails in this one.
K.S. Ravikumar had a great story but overloads it with a lot usual masala stuff, making it a tough watch.
The stunts reminded me of "Man of steel", with a lot of flying and destruction. Totally cringe worthy.
The director tries hard to bring the style element in, but fails. Because first the movies like Baasha, Padayappa, Arunachalam etc.. set a baseline standard for Thalaivar. Then the bar was set even higher by Shankar's Sivaji with an even more stylish Superstar. KSR tries to bring all these style elements together, failing big time.
Another extremely irritating part of the movie being the portrayal of the heroines. A total Arunachalam-Padayappa rip off. Those kind of heroines were popular then. Times have changed, it's 2015 now and social situations have changed a lot. But the director sadly, is still stuck in the 19th century.
IN A NUTSHELL, I WOULD SAY: The movie would have been better with only the RAJA's sequence, where SUPERSTAR would shine as an ACTOR rather than just a style icon.
Rajini did so well in the RAJA half, it was brilliant by the actor.
And one thing i would criticize on the RAJA's sequence would be that they fail to show the Architectural difficulties of building such a dam.
Other than that the RAJA's plot was just sheer brilliance. Certainly a watchable movie which could have been better.
The movie is well cast. Especially Vijayakumar, who does a great job.
The movie falls mainly due to poor direction, cinematography, music and pretty much every technical department fails in this one.
K.S. Ravikumar had a great story but overloads it with a lot usual masala stuff, making it a tough watch.
The stunts reminded me of "Man of steel", with a lot of flying and destruction. Totally cringe worthy.
The director tries hard to bring the style element in, but fails. Because first the movies like Baasha, Padayappa, Arunachalam etc.. set a baseline standard for Thalaivar. Then the bar was set even higher by Shankar's Sivaji with an even more stylish Superstar. KSR tries to bring all these style elements together, failing big time.
Another extremely irritating part of the movie being the portrayal of the heroines. A total Arunachalam-Padayappa rip off. Those kind of heroines were popular then. Times have changed, it's 2015 now and social situations have changed a lot. But the director sadly, is still stuck in the 19th century.
IN A NUTSHELL, I WOULD SAY: The movie would have been better with only the RAJA's sequence, where SUPERSTAR would shine as an ACTOR rather than just a style icon.
Rajini did so well in the RAJA half, it was brilliant by the actor.
And one thing i would criticize on the RAJA's sequence would be that they fail to show the Architectural difficulties of building such a dam.
Other than that the RAJA's plot was just sheer brilliance. Certainly a watchable movie which could have been better.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lingaa?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 1 046 138 $US
- Durée2 heures 54 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant