Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn investigation of 9/11.An investigation of 9/11.An investigation of 9/11.
Photos
Alberto Angela
- Self
- (archive footage)
George W. Bush
- Self
- (archive footage)
Mike Canavan
- Self
- (archive footage)
Dick Cheney
- Self
- (archive footage)
Ron DiFrancesco
- Self
- (archive footage)
Richard Gage
- Self
- (archive footage)
Rudy Giuliani
- Self
- (archive footage)
John Gross
- Self
- (archive footage)
Mark Loizeaux
- Self - Debunker
- (as Mark Loiseaux)
John McCain
- Self
- (archive footage)
James Meigs
- Self
- (as Jim Meigs)
Norman Mineta
- Self
- (archive footage)
Michael Moore
- Self
- (archive footage)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- Citations
Lt.Col. Robert M. Bowman: I am an old interceptor-pilot, and it's absolutely unbelievable that hijacked airliners could fly around for an hour and 40 minutes without being intercepted.
- ConnexionsFeatured in 9/11: Take the Quiz (2019)
Commentaire en vedette
I write this review only to provide some sense of balance, as at the time of writing there is only one other review on here.
I have no particular opinion on whether 9/11 was an inside job or not, neither do I believe in the New World Order or anything else like that. I was attracted to this film by its length and by how its arguments are constructed using publicly-available documentation, news footage, and the arguments of its /detractors/. There are some talking heads in support of the overall argument, but they are kept to a minimum. It is, in a way, an excellent example of the socratic method, whereby simply questioning a person (or organisation, or government) on its stance can cause it to break down and refute itself.
As such, it is a compelling watch. I watched it in two sittings in one day, and I didn't really feel the time. The arguments are carefully chosen, supported and summarised, each one with a single, simple question aimed at the proponents of the official story. Whatever you believe about 9/11, this is an admirably constructed documentary that is very clear in its purpose and demonstrates the kind of research and insight that is only possible in the Internet age, where disparate people of a shared mind can combine their time and resources and produce something way beyond the sum of their parts.
And to be honest, if you watch this you will at least be made aware of the very fluid nature of "truth" in a late-capitalist world, if not entirely swayed to the side of those who question the official 9/11 story. I recommend this to anyone who cares - or thinks they care - about truth, freedom and democracy.
I have no particular opinion on whether 9/11 was an inside job or not, neither do I believe in the New World Order or anything else like that. I was attracted to this film by its length and by how its arguments are constructed using publicly-available documentation, news footage, and the arguments of its /detractors/. There are some talking heads in support of the overall argument, but they are kept to a minimum. It is, in a way, an excellent example of the socratic method, whereby simply questioning a person (or organisation, or government) on its stance can cause it to break down and refute itself.
As such, it is a compelling watch. I watched it in two sittings in one day, and I didn't really feel the time. The arguments are carefully chosen, supported and summarised, each one with a single, simple question aimed at the proponents of the official story. Whatever you believe about 9/11, this is an admirably constructed documentary that is very clear in its purpose and demonstrates the kind of research and insight that is only possible in the Internet age, where disparate people of a shared mind can combine their time and resources and produce something way beyond the sum of their parts.
And to be honest, if you watch this you will at least be made aware of the very fluid nature of "truth" in a late-capitalist world, if not entirely swayed to the side of those who question the official 9/11 story. I recommend this to anyone who cares - or thinks they care - about truth, freedom and democracy.
- sccoverton
- 9 juill. 2015
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is September 11: The New Pearl Harbor?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 11 Septembre, le nouveau Pearl Harbor
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was September 11: The New Pearl Harbor (2013) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre