ÉVALUATION IMDb
8,2/10
80 k
MA NOTE
Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.
- A remporté 1 oscar
- 8 victoires et 27 nominations au total
Matt Damon
- Self - Narrator
- (voice)
Lee Hsien Loong
- Self - Prime Minister, Singapore
- (as Hsien Loong Lee)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOn being interviewed about this film, Henry Rollins likened Charles Ferguson's interviewing technique to "tightening the screws little by little until the interviewee starts to say "Ow.....ow.....ow and then, Stop the camera!"
- GaffesThe first time Paul Volcker's last name is shown it is written "Vocker".
- Citations
Andrew Sheng: Why should a financial engineer be paid four times to 100 times more than a real engineer? A real engineer build bridges. A financial engineer build dreams. And, you know, when those dreams turn out to be nightmares, other people pay for it
- Autres versionsWhen broadcast in the UK on BBC TV (as part of its Storyville documentary strand) in December 2011, on-screen dates of the speakers' positions were updated, notably Dominique Strauss-Kahn who resigned from the IMF in May 2011.
- ConnexionsFeatured in At the Movies: Cannes Film Festival 2010 (2010)
Commentaire en vedette
About 30 people at the 7PM show in the Music Box theater in Chicago last nite, and I was one of them.
I am always looking for two things on this economic disaster: 1) A better understanding, and 2) a means of explaining it better to others. This film delivers in both counts.
For me the key sequence came when the graphics, under solid narration, illustrated how 3rd tier investors were placing bets on bets. I.e., that's what derivatives are. I always knew this was happening, but the film made it very clear. That was the break point (in my analysis of the problem).
The film was nearly void of political leanings, which made it an important contribution. The only part that bothered me is that Congressman Barney Frank was framed as an expert looking back with wisdom on the ill-conceived passage of the "Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000", and, behold! Barney Frank *voted* for it. It would be better to interview all 4 Congressmen who voted against it: Ron Paul, Nick Smith, Gene Taylor and Peter DeFazio. [2 from each Party! How's that for Bipartism opposition? It took me 10 minutes to confirm these names, and I'm not even making a movie.]
It is significant that a continuum of hoodlums are seen on the podium with a continuum of Prsidents: Regan through Obama. The infestation of their ilk into the Political World is there for all to see.
Please see this film any way you can, and lock it in!
I am always looking for two things on this economic disaster: 1) A better understanding, and 2) a means of explaining it better to others. This film delivers in both counts.
For me the key sequence came when the graphics, under solid narration, illustrated how 3rd tier investors were placing bets on bets. I.e., that's what derivatives are. I always knew this was happening, but the film made it very clear. That was the break point (in my analysis of the problem).
The film was nearly void of political leanings, which made it an important contribution. The only part that bothered me is that Congressman Barney Frank was framed as an expert looking back with wisdom on the ill-conceived passage of the "Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000", and, behold! Barney Frank *voted* for it. It would be better to interview all 4 Congressmen who voted against it: Ron Paul, Nick Smith, Gene Taylor and Peter DeFazio. [2 from each Party! How's that for Bipartism opposition? It took me 10 minutes to confirm these names, and I'm not even making a movie.]
It is significant that a continuum of hoodlums are seen on the podium with a continuum of Prsidents: Regan through Obama. The infestation of their ilk into the Political World is there for all to see.
Please see this film any way you can, and lock it in!
- mbanak
- 20 oct. 2010
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Inside Job?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Cuộc Khủng Hoảng Kinh Tế
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 4 312 735 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 39 649 $ US
- 10 oct. 2010
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 7 871 522 $ US
- Durée1 heure 49 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant