ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,7/10
55 k
MA NOTE
Une cérémonie funéraire tourne à la catastrophe en mettant à jour des secrets de famille et des cadavres égarés.Une cérémonie funéraire tourne à la catastrophe en mettant à jour des secrets de famille et des cadavres égarés.Une cérémonie funéraire tourne à la catastrophe en mettant à jour des secrets de famille et des cadavres égarés.
- Prix
- 6 nominations au total
Zoe Saldana
- Elaine
- (as Zoë Saldaña)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn the original Joyeuses Funérailles (2007) screenplay, the character that Peter Dinklage ended up playing (named Peter) was of average height, and not written as an achondroplastic dwarf. The character was changed for him after he auditioned and was cast. He then became the only actor to reprise his role (with the name of Frank) in this remake.
- GaffesJeff says he's a pharmacology student. His father Duncan asks him how things are going at Pepperdine. Per their own website, Pepperdine has no pharmacology program. He is using term "pharmacology student" as a euphemism for "drug dealer."
- Bandes originalesLife
Written by Sly Stone (as Sylvester Stewart)
Performed by Sly and the Family Stone (as Sly & The Family Stone)
Courtesy of Epic Records
By Arrangement with Sony Music Entertainment
Commentaire en vedette
Despite having double the budget and some pretty big Hollywood stars the 2010 release adds nothing whatsoever, and in fact is in many ways inferior.
Not only are there some very lacklustre performances in particular from Chris Rock and Martin Lawrence as the two sons of the deceased, but the camera work in some sections is truly awful with the decision to use "handheld" or steadicam photography resulting in the picture shaking so badly in some sections that it is almost hard to watch.
Despite all this many of the best moments of the original are copied perfectly and work just as well as they did the first time around meaning that there are several good laughs to be had, but when you've got the choice of watching this or the original there's really no contest.
Distinctly average.
Not only are there some very lacklustre performances in particular from Chris Rock and Martin Lawrence as the two sons of the deceased, but the camera work in some sections is truly awful with the decision to use "handheld" or steadicam photography resulting in the picture shaking so badly in some sections that it is almost hard to watch.
Despite all this many of the best moments of the original are copied perfectly and work just as well as they did the first time around meaning that there are several good laughs to be had, but when you've got the choice of watching this or the original there's really no contest.
Distinctly average.
- NorthernDragon
- 24 mai 2010
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Death at a Funeral?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Death at a Funeral
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 21 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 42 739 347 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 16 217 540 $ US
- 18 avr. 2010
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 49 050 886 $ US
- Durée1 heure 32 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Japanese language plot outline for Joyeuses funérailles (2010)?
Répondre