Le Hollywood des années 1930 est revisité à travers le regard de Herman J. Mankiewicz, critique social cinglant et scénariste alcoolique, tandis qu'il s'efforce de terminer au plus vite l'éc... Tout lireLe Hollywood des années 1930 est revisité à travers le regard de Herman J. Mankiewicz, critique social cinglant et scénariste alcoolique, tandis qu'il s'efforce de terminer au plus vite l'écriture de Citizen Kane pour Orson Welles.Le Hollywood des années 1930 est revisité à travers le regard de Herman J. Mankiewicz, critique social cinglant et scénariste alcoolique, tandis qu'il s'efforce de terminer au plus vite l'écriture de Citizen Kane pour Orson Welles.
- A remporté 2 oscars
- 65 victoires et 269 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesGary Oldman wanted to wear elaborate prosthetic makeup to closely resemble the historical Herman J. Mankiewicz but was persuaded otherwise by David Fincher, who wanted minimal makeup for capturing a more intimate performance.
- GaffesIn the first flashback scene featuring the meeting between the writers, Josef Von Sternberg, and David O. Selznick in 1930, the characters mention Universal Studios as the "horror studio" and mention titles such as Frankenstein and The Wolf Man. Frankenstein would not be filmed and released until the following year while The Wolf Man would not be made until 1941; 11 years after the scene takes place.
- Citations
Herman Mankiewicz: You cannot capture a man's entire life in two hours. All you can hope is to leave the impression of one.
- Générique farfeluThe Netflix logos at the beginning and end are in full color, despite the film being in black and white.
- Bandes originales(If Only You Could) Save Me
Music & Lyrics by Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross
Produced by Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross
Vocals by Adryon de León
The story is a semi-fictionalized biography of Herman Mankiewiecz and it centers on how he wrote "Citizen Kane". The problem is that the movie goes on the assumption that he pretty much completely wrote the script and based it upon his contact with Hearst and his mistress, Marion Davies. While this is true...it's partially true according to most sources. The contributions of John Houseman and, especially, Orson Welles, are almost completely ignored by the film. So, my advice is don't take the film as the gospel truth...though I do appreciate how the film also manages, at least a bit, to show that Marion Davies was NOT the talentless idiot she was shown to be in "Citizen Kane"...something that just seemed cruel from that screenplay.
Overall, I found the film fascinating and with some excellent performances. But it's also not a film that I loved...mostly because it seemed to have an agenda...one that was more important that giving the entire truth.
*This film is full of inside jokes and cleverness that completely passes over the heads of most viewers and that annoyed me a bit. For example, when talking about the author Upton Sinclair, one comment made was that someone was so dumb that they thought he wrote "Elmer Gantry"...a book, incidentally, that was written by Sinclair Lewis (though they never explained this confusion nor why it is easy to make for most people). This just seemed awfully elitist.
- planktonrules
- 23 juill. 2021
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- مانك
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 25 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée2 heures 11 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.20 : 1