Krabat
- 2008
- 2h
ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,1/10
6,9 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA boy learns the black arts from an evil sorcerer.A boy learns the black arts from an evil sorcerer.A boy learns the black arts from an evil sorcerer.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDaniel Brühl has said this was the first time ever he agreed to be in a film without having read the screenplay or knowing who would be directing.
- GaffesWhen Krabat and Tonda go on their nightly trip on Easter, the pentagram that has been painted on Krabat's forehead changes from clearly to barely recognizable from scene to scene.
- Générique farfeluAs soon as the 20th Century Fox fanfare ends the whole screen and the logo turns dark and crows are flying by
- ConnexionsReferences C'est l'apocalypse (1979)
- Bandes originalesAllein Allein
by Polarkreis18
Commentaire en vedette
Having read the book times and times again since my childhood, I was excited to learn a movie was made, but I was disappinted.
The story, quickly summarized, is located in Augustus the Strong's Saxony, Germany around 1700. It is about a dark magical school disguised as a mill with 12 young journeymen and a master who trains his pupils but also has a contract with the devil to offer one of them each year. Krabat, a 14-year-old beggar enters the school, enthusiactically picks up magical knowledge but then notes the evil behind it and that he and his comrades are all in a deathly trap. The only way out, he learns, is to gain the love of a girl and have her asking his release from the master. But this comes at a deadly risk, and others have already failed and lost their lives...
Things that bother me on this movie: 1. The movie's mood is always dark. But in the book, while the apprentices are generally in a desperate situation, they are also young, and there are episodes full of wit and humor, the optimism of the youth. 2. Scenes of the book which would have been great in the film have been omitted, and dull scenes with no sense have been inserted instead. Left out are the Pumphutt duel (a great effects opportunity missed), the Dresden visit (again a great opportunity missed to show the beautiful palaces), the oxen sale, the mocking of the recruiters and much more scenes who could have inserted some fun into the dreary dullness. Instead we see a pointless and boring scene where the young men fight some soldiers who want to loot a village - this was not in the book. 3. The screenwriters and directors could not free themselves from images of other fantasy films with somewhat similar plotlines, mainly Star Wars and Harry Potter. Why do we need to see Palpatine the Emperor and the Marauder's Map in this movie? Why are the journeymen waving around with sticks like Jedi trainees? 4. In the book, the Kantorka has light hair to symbolize her "white magic" of love as opposed to the Dark Arts taught in the mill. In the movie she is black-haired and thus adds no visual contrast to the overall dark picture.
Summary: A missed opportunity. Please do a remake with better screenwriting/directing which follow the book more closely, because the book is a masterpiece you cannot improve.
The story, quickly summarized, is located in Augustus the Strong's Saxony, Germany around 1700. It is about a dark magical school disguised as a mill with 12 young journeymen and a master who trains his pupils but also has a contract with the devil to offer one of them each year. Krabat, a 14-year-old beggar enters the school, enthusiactically picks up magical knowledge but then notes the evil behind it and that he and his comrades are all in a deathly trap. The only way out, he learns, is to gain the love of a girl and have her asking his release from the master. But this comes at a deadly risk, and others have already failed and lost their lives...
Things that bother me on this movie: 1. The movie's mood is always dark. But in the book, while the apprentices are generally in a desperate situation, they are also young, and there are episodes full of wit and humor, the optimism of the youth. 2. Scenes of the book which would have been great in the film have been omitted, and dull scenes with no sense have been inserted instead. Left out are the Pumphutt duel (a great effects opportunity missed), the Dresden visit (again a great opportunity missed to show the beautiful palaces), the oxen sale, the mocking of the recruiters and much more scenes who could have inserted some fun into the dreary dullness. Instead we see a pointless and boring scene where the young men fight some soldiers who want to loot a village - this was not in the book. 3. The screenwriters and directors could not free themselves from images of other fantasy films with somewhat similar plotlines, mainly Star Wars and Harry Potter. Why do we need to see Palpatine the Emperor and the Marauder's Map in this movie? Why are the journeymen waving around with sticks like Jedi trainees? 4. In the book, the Kantorka has light hair to symbolize her "white magic" of love as opposed to the Dark Arts taught in the mill. In the movie she is black-haired and thus adds no visual contrast to the overall dark picture.
Summary: A missed opportunity. Please do a remake with better screenwriting/directing which follow the book more closely, because the book is a masterpiece you cannot improve.
- pkanzow
- 5 janv. 2020
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Krabat?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Krabat và Cối Xay Phù Thủy
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 10 000 000 € (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 13 042 251 $ US
- Durée2 heures
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant