12 Jours de Terreur

Titre original : 12 Days of Terror

Téléfilm
2004
PG-13
1h 27m

ÉVALUATION IMDb

5,5/10

1,9 k

MA NOTE

Liretrailer1 min 22 s

1 vidéo

4 photos

Drama Horror Thriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueFor twelve days in July, 1916, a shark patrolled the waterways of northern New Jersey. This docudrama is based on Richard Fernicola's account of those days.For twelve days in July, 1916, a shark patrolled the waterways of northern New Jersey. This docudrama is based on Richard Fernicola's account of those days.For twelve days in July, 1916, a shark patrolled the waterways of northern New Jersey. This docudrama is based on Richard Fernicola's account of those days.

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

ÉVALUATION IMDb

5,5/10

1,9 k

MA NOTE

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

Vidéos1

Trailer 1:22

12 Days of Terror

Photos

Histoire

Modifier

Le saviez-vous

Modifier

Anecdotes
The identity of the responsible shark has never been conclusively proven. While common legend states that a Great White is the sole shark responsible, some scientists think a bull shark might have been responsible for at least the three attacks in the creek. Others believe a school of sharks may have been responsible.

Gaffes
The end credits contain a few misspellings. For instance, the credit 'co-producer' is spelled 'co-producernas' and 'art director' is spelled 'art directorr' (these two examples are right next to each other).

Citations
Dr. John Nichols: I'm a fishman.

Connexions
Featured in MonsterQuest: Gigantic Killer Fish (2007)

Commentaires des utilisateurs21

Commentaire

Commentaire en vedette

3/10

12 Days of Terror: Stands out from the rest at least

In an industry saturated with shark themed movies it takes a lot to impress me. What needs to be done is throwing a curve ball, taking the shark movie and adding an angle or something to set it apart from the rest. The Scyfy channel to their credit have done that what with the likes of the Sharknado movies, Toxic Shark, Snow Sharks etc but with little success.

12 Days of Terror however does it successfully, kind of. You see it's based upon a book/true story and set in 1916 so immediately its set apart from the rest. That however is the best thing about it.

Starring John Rhys-Davies as the only recognizable face 12 Days of Terror certainly looks the part and the period but alas is about as exciting as a National Geographic special on sloth racing.

Seriously, I was bored to tears. Sure it looks great, the cinematography is above par and it's handled competently but I couldn't get past how dull it all was. At no point was I gripped, did I care about the characters or really find myself invested in the film.

Points for effort, but little else.

The Good:

John Rhys-Davies

Fantastic setting

The Bad:

Frustratingly lifeless