ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,0/10
24 k
MA NOTE
Un écrivain débutant est engagé comme croupier dans un casino, où il se rend compte que sa vie de croupier ferait un grand roman.Un écrivain débutant est engagé comme croupier dans un casino, où il se rend compte que sa vie de croupier ferait un grand roman.Un écrivain débutant est engagé comme croupier dans un casino, où il se rend compte que sa vie de croupier ferait un grand roman.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSat on the shelf for two years before release.
- GaffesWhen Jack has a job interview at the London casino his father recommends him for, the manager (Mr. Reynolds) at one stage asks him the current count at the Blackjack table. Jack insists it is -9, the manager insists it is -8 to which Jack confides smugly to himself "It had taken him 45 minutes but Jack now had Mr. Reynolds number. The man couldn't count." Neither Jack or Mr. Reynolds can count. The count is actually at +2.
- Autres versionsThree versions were released: a general theatrical release, a slightly edited cut for Argentina, and a more edited one for Poland. Runtimes were, respectively, "1h 34m (94 min), 1h 34m (94 min--Argentina)", and "1h 31m (91 min--Poland).
Commentaire en vedette
Croupier is a film that shouldn't work. It doesn't have a conventional plot, doesn't seem to be about anything, (it's got gambling in it and is set inside a casino, but isn't really about gambling.) and the main character seems to have no clear desire for anything. I'm still wondering why I enjoyed it so much. Perhaps the absence of these motifs that you'd expect in any conventional film is what makes it special, I suspect that they add to it's originality, but what really makes the film work is how completely engaging the main character is made.
Jack Manfred, from his chain smoking to his dry voice-over, is completely engaging as a character, without having to go through any obvious conventionalities that would force the audience into finding him endearing. This is surely a combination of Mike Hodges directorial skill, the script and Clive Owen's acting ability.
The film is essentially a character study, with a front of a gambling film, that examines this character and his relationships with the people in his life, - his girlfriend, boss, father and colleagues, how he sees the world, and how he will cope when presented with certain situations.
It is brought to the screen with quality that demands attention and a score that heightens the atmosphere the film creates and really sets the tone.
Jack Manfred, from his chain smoking to his dry voice-over, is completely engaging as a character, without having to go through any obvious conventionalities that would force the audience into finding him endearing. This is surely a combination of Mike Hodges directorial skill, the script and Clive Owen's acting ability.
The film is essentially a character study, with a front of a gambling film, that examines this character and his relationships with the people in his life, - his girlfriend, boss, father and colleagues, how he sees the world, and how he will cope when presented with certain situations.
It is brought to the screen with quality that demands attention and a score that heightens the atmosphere the film creates and really sets the tone.
- The_Triad
- 27 oct. 2006
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Croupier?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 6 201 143 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 63 472 $ US
- 23 avr. 2000
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 7 120 568 $ US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le croupier (1998) officially released in India in English?
Répondre