ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,4/10
2,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueSword and sorcery story of the cosmic struggle between white magic and black magic.Sword and sorcery story of the cosmic struggle between white magic and black magic.Sword and sorcery story of the cosmic struggle between white magic and black magic.
Roberto Nelson
- Erlick
- (as Bob Nelson)
Ana De Sade
- Delissia
- (as Ana de Sade)
Roberto Ballesteros
- Traigon
- (as Robert Ballesteros)
Douglas Sandoval
- Hunnu
- (as Douglas Sanders)
Antonio Zubiaga
- Khrakannon
- (as Tony Stevens)
Silvia Manríquez
- Kanti
- (as Silvia Masters)
Luz María Jerez
- Dancer
- (as Lucy Jensen)
Miguel Ángel Fuentes
- Player
- (as Michael Fountain)
Paco Pharrez
- Armorer
- (as Peter Farmer)
Fidel Garriga
- Soldier
- (as Phillip Garrigan)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector Jack Hill asked that his name be removed from the credits for two reasons: (1) the special effects, around which much of the script had been written, ended up being much less impressive than producer Roger Corman had promised, and (2) Hill had written a role for his friend Sid Haig but Corman refused to hire him at the last minute.
- GaffesWhen Mira and Mara hold out their hands for Krona, they do so palms up. In the close-up, their hands are palms down.
- ConnexionsEdited into Wizards of the Lost Kingdom (1985)
Commentaire en vedette
From the reviews above, i expected an ultra low-budget, creatively bankrupt titty-palooza.
What I got was something at least marginally better than all that. Sure, it's sword&sorcery on a budget, but it's far from ultra-low! On the contrary there are numerous sets, tons of costumes, exotic animals, even some animatronics! They obviously had real stuntmen, fight choreography, and all the trappings of an actual movie production. What I'm getting at here is, if you've seen many sword & sandal films as I have, just know that this is far from the cheapest. It has more production value than an episode of TV's Xena, for instance.
Yes, there is plenty of nudity. And sex in general has the importance of a subplot throughout the flick, but it's also far from those films that are blatant excuses to show some boobies and nothing more. The movie has a story that's understandable and fable-like, and it's interesting enough to stand on its own, titties or no titties.
If you like the Sword & Sorcery genre, just know that you could do a lot worse.
What I got was something at least marginally better than all that. Sure, it's sword&sorcery on a budget, but it's far from ultra-low! On the contrary there are numerous sets, tons of costumes, exotic animals, even some animatronics! They obviously had real stuntmen, fight choreography, and all the trappings of an actual movie production. What I'm getting at here is, if you've seen many sword & sandal films as I have, just know that this is far from the cheapest. It has more production value than an episode of TV's Xena, for instance.
Yes, there is plenty of nudity. And sex in general has the importance of a subplot throughout the flick, but it's also far from those films that are blatant excuses to show some boobies and nothing more. The movie has a story that's understandable and fable-like, and it's interesting enough to stand on its own, titties or no titties.
If you like the Sword & Sorcery genre, just know that you could do a lot worse.
- pabstcanrocketship
- 20 déc. 2018
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Sorceress?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 500 000 $ US (estimation)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant