La vie et les afflictions de l'iconographe russe du XVe siècle Saint Andrei Roublev.La vie et les afflictions de l'iconographe russe du XVe siècle Saint Andrei Roublev.La vie et les afflictions de l'iconographe russe du XVe siècle Saint Andrei Roublev.
- Prix
- 4 victoires et 1 nomination au total
- Durochka
- (as Irma Raush)
- Patrikey, monakh
- (as Yu. Nikulin)
- Skomorokh
- (as R. Bykov)
- Stepan, sotnik Velikogo knyazya
- (as N. Grabbe)
- Foma, monakh
- (as M. Kononov)
- Starshiy liteyshchik
- (as S. Krylov)
- Tatarskiy khan
- (as B. Beyshenaliev)
- Aleksey, monakh
- (as A. Obukhov)
- Sergey
- (as Volodya Titov)
- Efim
- (as N. Glazkov)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilm debut of Anatoliy Solonitsyn.
- GaffesThe smoothly-cut logs that feature many times in the early scenes are clearly cut with machinery not available in the early fifteenth century.
- Citations
Andrei Rublyov: You just spoke of Jesus. Perhaps he was born and crucified to reconcile God and man. Jesus came from God, so he is all-powerful. And if He died on the cross it was predetermined and His crucifixion and death were God's will. That would have aroused hatred not in those that crucified him but in those that loved him if they had been near him at that moment, because they loved him as a man only. But if He, of His own will, left them, He displayed injustice, or even cruelty. Maybe those who crucified him loved him because they helped in this divine plan.
- Autres versionsWhen released in the UK, the sight of a horse falling off a staircase was cut from this title.
- ConnexionsEdited into Ombres vives ...une autre histoire du cinema... (2013)
Tarkovsky wanted to make art that would change people's lives and in this he succeeded. Although his life was troubled and his projects clawed into life randomly from the grip of his film studio bosses, when viewed as a whole they seem to be all part of some great plan that was meant to reach fruition right from the start. He believed that ultimately it is best to do things that deepen one's inner life rather than impoverish it. That may explain why you leave most Hollywood films feeling soiled. There are too many great scenes and moments in this astonishing and monumental work to mention so I won't. Suffice it to say it would have been fascinating to have seen what Tarkovsky would have made had he lived and returned from exile to his homeland. Recent events in Russia and the Balkans make this film even more vital and pertinent today.
The trouble is Tarkovsky's films have such extraordinary purity and spiritual depth that no other films seem able to satisfy one in the same way. They seem flat, lifeless and unable to compete. Why watch the let's-pretend-grown ups like Tarantino when you can watch a real grown up? So like I said, Bloody Tarkovsky. He has ruined cinema for me.
- Gary-161
- 31 janv. 2000
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Andrei Rublev?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Andrei Rublev
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 000 000 RUR (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 124 189 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 11 537 $ US
- 15 sept. 2002
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 176 472 $ US
- Durée3 heures 9 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1