Julius Caesar

1970
G
1h 57m

ÉVALUATION IMDb

MA NOTE

Ce remake du classique de William Shakespeare retrace la trahison de l'empereur par le sénat romain, le complot qui a mené à l'assassinat de César et les velléités de Rome.Ce remake du classique de William Shakespeare retrace la trahison de l'empereur par le sénat romain, le complot qui a mené à l'assassinat de César et les velléités de Rome.Ce remake du classique de William Shakespeare retrace la trahison de l'empereur par le sénat romain, le complot qui a mené à l'assassinat de César et les velléités de Rome.

Director
- Stuart Burge
Writers
- Robert Furnival
- William Shakespeare
Stars

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

ÉVALUATION IMDb

6,1/10

2,1 k

MA NOTE

Director
- Stuart Burge
Writers
- Robert Furnival
- William Shakespeare
Stars

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

Anecdotes
Robert Vaughn says in his memoirs that Jason Robards, Jr. was very unhappy during the filming period, and dubious about the end result.

Gaffes
Cassius drinks from a wooden cup during the riot scene. When he throws the wooden cup it makes a sound as if it was glass.

Citations
Julius Caesar: Let me have men about me that are fat; Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep o' nights. Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.

Connexions
Featured in History Buffs: Rome Season Two (2017)

Commentaires des utilisateurs41

Commentaire

Commentaire en vedette

7/10

Hollywood Shakespeare, but not at all bad

I've seen plenty bum Shakespeare, but Jason Robards as Brutus he takes me the cake. He resembled nothing so much as a barrel with a head on top. The rest of the cast was pretty good, however, especially Richard Johnson as Cassius (why wasn't HE Brutus), Diana Rigg as Portia and Charlton Heston as Antony. John Gielgud as Caesar does his lines beautifully, as always, but does not quite convey the menace and power of Caesar. (He was better as Cassius in the 1953 version.) Interesting here is the contrast in line delivery between Johnson and Robards; it makes you wonder why Cassius isn't the leader and hope of the conspiracy. Production values are sometimes dubious; but battle scenes are better than the cowboys-and-Indians fight in the 1953 version. Of course, the text is shortened, but all essential scenes are kept.