Dans un procès pour meurtre, l'accusé avoue avoir souffert de folie passagère après que la victime ait violé sa femme. Quelle est la vérité, et va-t-il gagner son procès ?Dans un procès pour meurtre, l'accusé avoue avoir souffert de folie passagère après que la victime ait violé sa femme. Quelle est la vérité, et va-t-il gagner son procès ?Dans un procès pour meurtre, l'accusé avoue avoir souffert de folie passagère après que la victime ait violé sa femme. Quelle est la vérité, et va-t-il gagner son procès ?
- Nommé pour 7 oscars
- 10 victoires et 18 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPart of the controversy surrounding this movie was because it included use of the words "bitch", "contraceptive", "panties", "penetration", "rape", "slut", and "sperm".
- GaffesJames Stewart goes to negotiate with the DA at the courthouse. Sign over the DA's door is misspelled "Proseguting attorney". Actually this is not true. It's possible to compare the c with the g at the end of the word, and you can see the g has a descending stroke. It's just a foible of the font.
- Citations
Paul Biegler: As a lawyer, I've had to learn that people aren't just good or just bad. People are many things.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Portrait of an Actor (1971)
Commentaire en vedette
Lawyer Paul Biegler takes the case of Lt. Manion who killed a man after he discovered he had raped his wife, Laura. Biegler realises that the cards are not all in his favour and begins to ensure that the facts are spun in his favour as much as possible during the trial.
This film caused a stir back when it was released supposedly over the dialogue that contained words not used before in a motion picture. However it was more likely that the furore was over the cynical view of the legal profession that the film has. The story is good, but if you're looking for a John Grisham type film with shouting and ridiculous twists in the final reel then you're in the wrong place. What we have here is a clever, interesting story that moves slowly focusing on Biegler rather than twists and turns in the actual plot.
Biegler is sort of clean cut, but he seems like a real lawyer he twists facts and prompts lies in order to improve his case. The various tricks and theatrical shenanigans during the trail are also well observed. The characters are all interesting with only the judge seeming like a dull stereotype.
James Stewart is excellent and helps make the shifty lawyer more likeable and relatable. Remick is excellent as the flirtatious Laura while Gazzara is cool as the accused. George C Scott doesn't have much to do, but does well anyway.
Overall a very enjoyable courtroom thriller it lacks the fireworks of modern legal dramas but has a nice cynical edge to it that shows it isn't as in awe of the law as Grisham is.
This film caused a stir back when it was released supposedly over the dialogue that contained words not used before in a motion picture. However it was more likely that the furore was over the cynical view of the legal profession that the film has. The story is good, but if you're looking for a John Grisham type film with shouting and ridiculous twists in the final reel then you're in the wrong place. What we have here is a clever, interesting story that moves slowly focusing on Biegler rather than twists and turns in the actual plot.
Biegler is sort of clean cut, but he seems like a real lawyer he twists facts and prompts lies in order to improve his case. The various tricks and theatrical shenanigans during the trail are also well observed. The characters are all interesting with only the judge seeming like a dull stereotype.
James Stewart is excellent and helps make the shifty lawyer more likeable and relatable. Remick is excellent as the flirtatious Laura while Gazzara is cool as the accused. George C Scott doesn't have much to do, but does well anyway.
Overall a very enjoyable courtroom thriller it lacks the fireworks of modern legal dramas but has a nice cynical edge to it that shows it isn't as in awe of the law as Grisham is.
- bob the moo
- 24 mars 2002
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Anatomy of a Murder
- Lieux de tournage
- Tripoli Bar, Ishpeming, Michigan, États-Unis(interiors: Thunder Bay Inn)
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 194 $ US
- Durée2 heures 41 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant