ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,9/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueScientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.
Parcourir les épisodes
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe three hosts started this project after their release from mythbusters over a salary dispute.
- ConnexionsReferenced in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Howard & Grant (2020)
Commentaire en vedette
Mythbusters found out that you could not take the Build Team out of the show. Can you run a show using only the Build Team? And doing things similar to Mythbusters, without outright plagiarizing it? That's not an easy task.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
- jensstark
- 10 déc. 2016
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does White Rabbit Project have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Проект Белый кролик
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée48 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant