El agente especial Avery Ryan trabaja resolviendo crímenes como ciber-psicólogo para el FBI.El agente especial Avery Ryan trabaja resolviendo crímenes como ciber-psicólogo para el FBI.El agente especial Avery Ryan trabaja resolviendo crímenes como ciber-psicólogo para el FBI.
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 2 nominaciones en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe lead character is based on real-life CyberPsychologist Mary Aiken.
- Citas
Avery Ryan: [voiceover during precredit opening sequence] My name is Avery Ryan. I was a victim of cybercrime. Like you, I posted on social media; checked my bank balance online; even kept the confidential files of my psychological practice on my computer. Then I was hacked. And as a result, one of my patients was murdered. My investigation into her death led me to the F.B.I., where I joined a team of cyberexperts, to wage a war against a new breed of criminal hiding on the deep web, infiltrating our daily lives in ways we never imagined. Faceless. Nameless. Lurking inside our devices. Just a keystroke away. It can happen to you...
- ConexionesReferenced in CSI: Crime Scene Investigation: The Twin Paradox (2014)
Just: awful, awful, awful.
I cannot believe that - having cancelled all 3 of the other 'CSI' programmes - the producers then give us yet another programme of the exact same style!
It has been churned out with techniques identical to the last few series of 'CSI's 1 to 3. This sadly resulted in a first episode with the following flaws:
~ meandering plot ~ dull story ~ inconsequential events ~ confused schematic ~ none of the wit or humour hoped for ~ zero warmth from the protagonists ~ no depth or scope i.e superficial ~ nil characterisation or back stories for the players (until at the very end, when it was far too late to enthral me in any way!)
I was hoping to see another programme of the quality of the first few series of the original 'CSI' - when "Grissom" et al really grabbed my interest, and the plots were feasible and properly fleshed out. Instead, this CSI-4 simply - and unbelievably - reproduced the very death throes of 'CSI' & the other 2 'CSI' series.
Yet another US show with a fatal case of style over substance. Gloss does NOT equate to quality.
I had SO looked forward to this new series. So I was HORRIFIED to see such a lazy production being rolled out.
The episode was proving abysmal even after the first 5 minutes, and dropped ever lower in my estimation the further the drama went on.
I would have hoped to be able to watch the second episode, in order to give the whole series a critique - i.e. after perusal of more than just one storyline. But, having seen the exact same style of programme in the last days of 'CSI's 1 to 3, there is clearly NO hope that CSI-4 will change. So I am signing off the series as of now. And have in fact already deleted the 10+ episodes that we had so far recorded... 1 hour is enough of my life wasted! ,-) After all, if the 'CSI' studio haven't learnt by now, then from this first episode they have proved that they never will.
Sadly, I can give this programme no more than 1 out of 10, as the production studio should have known better.
No-one can blame the actors, so please, please - Patricia Arquette, Peter MacNicol, et al - MOVE ON to something worth your skills.
I just HAD to get my opinion down. A form of catharsis, no doubt!! ,-)
One last point: the best thing about this programme? In fact, the ONLY good thing? Is ANOTHER superb theme song from the catalogue of 'The Who'. So I am off to YouTube to listen again to the great 'I Can See For Miles'. Now that WILL be 4 minutes well spent!
- SceneByScene
- 2 dic 2015
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
- How many seasons does CSI: Cyber have?Con tecnología de Alexa