Common Outlaws

2014
1h 32min

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

4.8/10

124

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Reproducir trailer1:20

1 video

2 fotos

Action Crime Drama Western

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaSet in the "timeless" River City, Indiana, The Hurley Boy's set out to absolve the sins of their wrongfully accused father. But what is the cost of revenge? A tragic tale of family, revenge,... Leer todoSet in the "timeless" River City, Indiana, The Hurley Boy's set out to absolve the sins of their wrongfully accused father. But what is the cost of revenge? A tragic tale of family, revenge, and the consequences of hate.Set in the "timeless" River City, Indiana, The Hurley Boy's set out to absolve the sins of their wrongfully accused father. But what is the cost of revenge? A tragic tale of family, revenge, and the consequences of hate.

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

4.8/10

124

TU CALIFICACIÓN

4Opiniones de los usuarios

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Videos1

Trailer 1:20

Common Outlaws

Fotos

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que…?

Editar

Trivia
Mark Clem read the opening monologue from El padrino (1972) at his audition for the role of Quintin McCall.

Errores
When Cash and Winston are sitting discussing that Time has no remorse Cash rolls a cigarette. When he goes to light this freshly rolled cigarette, it is charred and has already been lit once. You can see that it has even been snuffed out once. This occurs at 32:40.

Conexiones
References El padrino (1972)

Opiniones de usuarios4

Opinión

Opinión destacada

2/10

Really not a very good film

This could have been a good film. The script was decent enough for most parts, except it was a 100 years out of time (gunslinging wild west set in the 50's or so?). The acting was desperately bad with even worse "over acting" at points. The camera work was just bad for most of the film. I've seen student films with better camera work! Too many cheesy lines thrown in with bad acted delivery. I'm a fan of low budget films and the wild west, but this was just painful to sit through. i did turn it off, but later finished it.

who ever wrote the great review that made me say yes to watching this movie, is either a friend of the film makers or watched a different film to the one in question.

awful, but a really nice try at this genre.

2 1/2 purely for the attempt.