Emergency
- 2025
- 2h 26min
1975. Una crónica de los incidentes que tuvieron lugar bajo el liderazgo de la Sra. Indira Gandhi, una de las mujeres más poderosas de la historia de la India.1975. Una crónica de los incidentes que tuvieron lugar bajo el liderazgo de la Sra. Indira Gandhi, una de las mujeres más poderosas de la historia de la India.1975. Una crónica de los incidentes que tuvieron lugar bajo el liderazgo de la Sra. Indira Gandhi, una de las mujeres más poderosas de la historia de la India.
Zeba Hussain
- Kamala Nehru
- (as Zeba Anjum)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaKangana Ranaut revealed in several interviews that what appealed to her about former Prime Minister's life was the tragedy of it all - often drawing parallel to a Shakespearan tragedy.
- Citas
Pupul Jayakar: The easiest way to fall down is to let go of those who were there with you from the beginning.
Opinión destacada
Kangana Ranaut's Emergency promised to be a bold and gripping take on one of the darkest periods in Indian political history. However, the execution leaves much to be desired, as the film falters on multiple fronts, from its skewed historical narrative to lackluster direction and acting.
The film's premise, centered around the controversial Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in 1975, had the potential to offer an insightful exploration of a politically charged and complex era. Unfortunately, Kangana's portrayal of historical events feels overly dramatized and riddled with inaccuracies. Instead of delivering a nuanced and balanced account, the film leans heavily on a one-sided perspective, sacrificing historical depth for sensationalism.
As a director, Kangana struggles to maintain a coherent narrative. The pacing is uneven, with certain key events either rushed or stretched unnecessarily. Scenes that should carry emotional weight often fall flat due to poor transitions and an overall lack of subtlety. The dialogue, peppered with melodrama, further detracts from the story's credibility.
Kangana's performance as Indira Gandhi also disappoints. While she undoubtedly puts in the effort to embody the former Prime Minister, her portrayal comes across as superficial and inconsistent. The lack of emotional depth in her acting makes it hard to connect with her character, leaving the audience unengaged.
The supporting cast, though competent, is underutilized, with their characters reduced to mere caricatures. This further highlights the film's failure to delve into the complexities of the Emergency period and its impact on diverse sections of society.
On a technical level, Emergency fares slightly better, with its cinematography and production design doing justice to the era it depicts. However, these elements cannot compensate for the film's fundamental shortcomings in storytelling and characterization.
Overall, Emergency is an ambitious project that misses the mark. While Kangana's intention to tackle a pivotal chapter in India's history is commendable, her flawed take on the subject, coupled with sloppy direction and an underwhelming performance, makes for a disappointing cinematic experience. A more balanced and well-researched approach might have elevated the film, but as it stands, Emergency feels like a missed opportunity.
The film's premise, centered around the controversial Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in 1975, had the potential to offer an insightful exploration of a politically charged and complex era. Unfortunately, Kangana's portrayal of historical events feels overly dramatized and riddled with inaccuracies. Instead of delivering a nuanced and balanced account, the film leans heavily on a one-sided perspective, sacrificing historical depth for sensationalism.
As a director, Kangana struggles to maintain a coherent narrative. The pacing is uneven, with certain key events either rushed or stretched unnecessarily. Scenes that should carry emotional weight often fall flat due to poor transitions and an overall lack of subtlety. The dialogue, peppered with melodrama, further detracts from the story's credibility.
Kangana's performance as Indira Gandhi also disappoints. While she undoubtedly puts in the effort to embody the former Prime Minister, her portrayal comes across as superficial and inconsistent. The lack of emotional depth in her acting makes it hard to connect with her character, leaving the audience unengaged.
The supporting cast, though competent, is underutilized, with their characters reduced to mere caricatures. This further highlights the film's failure to delve into the complexities of the Emergency period and its impact on diverse sections of society.
On a technical level, Emergency fares slightly better, with its cinematography and production design doing justice to the era it depicts. However, these elements cannot compensate for the film's fundamental shortcomings in storytelling and characterization.
Overall, Emergency is an ambitious project that misses the mark. While Kangana's intention to tackle a pivotal chapter in India's history is commendable, her flawed take on the subject, coupled with sloppy direction and an underwhelming performance, makes for a disappointing cinematic experience. A more balanced and well-researched approach might have elevated the film, but as it stands, Emergency feels like a missed opportunity.
- jaydip_dattaray
- 18 ene 2025
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Emergency?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 119,725
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 26 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta