CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.3/10
53 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un grupo de investigadores es sacudido cuando la hija adolescente de una de ellos es la víctima de un brutal asesinato.Un grupo de investigadores es sacudido cuando la hija adolescente de una de ellos es la víctima de un brutal asesinato.Un grupo de investigadores es sacudido cuando la hija adolescente de una de ellos es la víctima de un brutal asesinato.
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 3 nominaciones en total
Patrick Davis Alarcón
- Luis
- (as Patrick Davis)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film's cinematographer Daniel Moder is the husband of Julia Roberts. This marks their third collaboration.
- ErroresIn both scenes where Ray and Bumpy spot Pac-Man, first in the horse stable and again at the baseball game, Ray calls out to him, giving him the heads-up and thus causing him to get away. Why on earth would a seasoned cop give the suspect a warning before he could subdue him?
- Citas
Jess: Life sentence, right?
Ray Kasten: For you, too.
- ConexionesFeatured in Conan: Chiwetel Ejiofor/Phil Rosenthal/Sean Donnelly (2015)
- Bandas sonorasHaunted
Performed by Maty Noyes
Written by Stephan Moccio, Maty Noyes and Billy Ray
Engineered by Jay Paul Bicknell
Opinión destacada
If you haven't seen "El Segreto de sus ojos" I beg you to stop reading and go check it out, it is, in my opinion, one of those rare and pure thrillers that keeps you glued to the screen for two hours. Yet, despite loving the original, I wasn't going into this one ready to bitch about it. I am someone who is very sniffy about remakes, but hey if you have an fascinating premise that can be explored through various styles and dynamics I am all for it. Especially in this case, I think that keeping some of the core material and turning other parts completely around could have made for a fascinating narrative, unfortunately the American remake, with the exception of maybe two or three ides, doesn't improve, explore or further the original in anyway and sometimes even edges the shot-by-shot remake treatment.
Look, this isn't a terrible thriller, but the emotional beats you are carried through are just the same of the original, it really seemed to be watching a cheap version of it. It is way too reminiscent of the original and at some moments I really felt exactly when I saw it. Whilst at other moments I kind of felt sorry for the remake because it doesn't manage to replicate some of the amazing photography the first one had and actually miserably fails: this film has some really, noticeably cheap cinematography and editing.
The performances are all kind of off beat. Julia Roberts is definitely the best one, even though she also has some low points. The rest of the cast is just flat honestly. Nobody even tries to come in and give it some palpable passion. The film is also inconsistent with tone and I am not sure they understood the fascination of the original because a lot of the focus points are just sidelined or shoehorned in.
That's also a real bummer, because the film does have just a couple of good ideas that aren't simply built on. They tread too much of the same ground and do it in a way that is simply too familiar. I can maybe think of one thing that was improved upon and that is mainly thanks to Julia Roberts' talent. The score is something that positively sticks out and probably the purest good thing to come out of the film.
In the end we are treated to a fine thriller that doesn't live up to its potential and only manages to justify its length thanks to memories of the original and the same emotions instead of relevant improvement and originality.
Look, this isn't a terrible thriller, but the emotional beats you are carried through are just the same of the original, it really seemed to be watching a cheap version of it. It is way too reminiscent of the original and at some moments I really felt exactly when I saw it. Whilst at other moments I kind of felt sorry for the remake because it doesn't manage to replicate some of the amazing photography the first one had and actually miserably fails: this film has some really, noticeably cheap cinematography and editing.
The performances are all kind of off beat. Julia Roberts is definitely the best one, even though she also has some low points. The rest of the cast is just flat honestly. Nobody even tries to come in and give it some palpable passion. The film is also inconsistent with tone and I am not sure they understood the fascination of the original because a lot of the focus points are just sidelined or shoehorned in.
That's also a real bummer, because the film does have just a couple of good ideas that aren't simply built on. They tread too much of the same ground and do it in a way that is simply too familiar. I can maybe think of one thing that was improved upon and that is mainly thanks to Julia Roberts' talent. The score is something that positively sticks out and probably the purest good thing to come out of the film.
In the end we are treated to a fine thriller that doesn't live up to its potential and only manages to justify its length thanks to memories of the original and the same emotions instead of relevant improvement and originality.
- Giacomo_De_Bello
- 11 nov 2015
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Secret in Their Eyes?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 19,500,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 20,180,155
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 6,652,996
- 22 nov 2015
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 34,854,990
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the streaming release date of Secretos de una obsesión (2015) in India?
Responda