CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.7/10
3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Los pasajeros de un crucero mediterráneo disfrutan a la par que una familia sufre por la atención sobrecogedora por parte de los medios de comunicación.Los pasajeros de un crucero mediterráneo disfrutan a la par que una familia sufre por la atención sobrecogedora por parte de los medios de comunicación.Los pasajeros de un crucero mediterráneo disfrutan a la par que una familia sufre por la atención sobrecogedora por parte de los medios de comunicación.
- Premios
- 5 premios ganados y 2 nominaciones en total
Agatha Couture
- Alissa (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as A. Couture)
Mathias Domahidy
- Mathias (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as M. Domahidy)
Quentin Grosset
- Ludovic (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as Q. Grosset)
Maurice Sarfati
- (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as M. Sarfati)
Nadège Beausson-Diagne
- Constance (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as N. Beausson)
Dominique Devals
- (segment "Des choses comme ça")
- (as D. Devals)
Marine Battaggia
- Florine "Flo" Martin (segment "Quo vadis Europa")
- (as M. Battaggia)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film did not include traditional English language subtitles for releases in countries that spoke such language. Instead, the subtitles were in "Navajo English", a translation that baffled many critics and audience members.
- ErroresSomeone claims that Napoleon founded the Comédie-Française in 1812 in Moscow. Actually, it was founded in 1680 by Louis XIV.
- Citas
Rebecca (segment "Des choses comme ça"): [dialogue continuity] You're absolutely right: I don't love any "people." Not French, not North American, not German. Not Jewish people, not black people. I love only my friends... When there are any.
- ConexionesEdited from El acorazado Potemkin (1925)
Opinión destacada
Jean-Luc Godard is a reference in cinema and changed the art fifty years ago with a unique challenging style that defied current esthetics and etiquette.
His latest work can be described more as an eclectic experiment than any enduring piece of cinema, but it serves to show his mastery of the art and his ability to dissect it in its most basic components before trying to create a different, distinct experience for the viewer. He plays with themes, locations, styles and intermingles with little restriction photos, videos, ambient sounds, silence, music, narrations, monologues, dialogues to delves into a dream-like undefined cinematic discussion.
The film does not quite work as a whole, precisely from this lack of focus, but some of the imagery (some sharp and some out of focus, some old and some new, some seemingly meaningless and some full of allegories, etc.), dialogues (existential, simple, social, revolutionary) and intertitles do reach a cord and will be remembered subconsciously or consciously. It's lack of clear content or continuity should not take away from it's task of deconstruction and desire to destabilise our current comforts. In that aspect, Godard grabs the rug under conventional cinema and pulls very hard to make it topple over dumbfounded and confused.
There are three segments, each shorter than the previous, but besides being glad to finally leave this seemingly derelict boat and to briefly know a fictional philosophising family, there is not enough distinction between the segments to warrant further feedback at this point. Only that as Godard's life perhaps, and exemplified in the crafty ancient time-telling device in segment #2, time is getting shorter...
Maybe we'll get it right some day, may be one of many messages of this remue-méninges.
His latest work can be described more as an eclectic experiment than any enduring piece of cinema, but it serves to show his mastery of the art and his ability to dissect it in its most basic components before trying to create a different, distinct experience for the viewer. He plays with themes, locations, styles and intermingles with little restriction photos, videos, ambient sounds, silence, music, narrations, monologues, dialogues to delves into a dream-like undefined cinematic discussion.
The film does not quite work as a whole, precisely from this lack of focus, but some of the imagery (some sharp and some out of focus, some old and some new, some seemingly meaningless and some full of allegories, etc.), dialogues (existential, simple, social, revolutionary) and intertitles do reach a cord and will be remembered subconsciously or consciously. It's lack of clear content or continuity should not take away from it's task of deconstruction and desire to destabilise our current comforts. In that aspect, Godard grabs the rug under conventional cinema and pulls very hard to make it topple over dumbfounded and confused.
There are three segments, each shorter than the previous, but besides being glad to finally leave this seemingly derelict boat and to briefly know a fictional philosophising family, there is not enough distinction between the segments to warrant further feedback at this point. Only that as Godard's life perhaps, and exemplified in the crafty ancient time-telling device in segment #2, time is getting shorter...
Maybe we'll get it right some day, may be one of many messages of this remue-méninges.
- christian94
- 19 ago 2012
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Film socialisme?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Cine socialismo
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 42,925
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,526
- 5 jun 2011
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 222,079
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Un filme socialista (2010) officially released in India in English?
Responda