CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.8/10
3.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.A sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.A sheriff and his son chase casino robbers, only to find the all of them are being chased by something else.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Baadja-Lyne Odums
- Psychiatrist
- (as Baadja-Lyne)
Lawrence E Thomas
- Priest
- (as Lawrence Thomas)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaSheriff Reed is shown wearing corporal chevrons on the sleeves of his uniform. A sheriff would not wear corporal stripes.
- Créditos curiososFunded in part by the Council for the Ethical Use of Cell Phones at Gas Pumps
- ConexionesFollows Reeker (2005)
- Bandas sonorasWine by Wine
Written by Roger Wallace
Performed by Roger Wallace
Natchez Street Music, BMI
Courtesy of Texas Round-Up Records
Opinión destacada
In case anyone doesn't know, this movie is in fact a sequel (the first simply called 'Reeker'), and this time it follows the plot, well...almost identical to the first one.
This is a major problem.
In the original film there is a rather large twist at the end, and if you don't already guess it, it is a great twist. This film follows the exact same twist, so if you've seen the first, then there's not much to see here. It's basically a remake, with slightly different circumstances.
On a plus point, the baddie does have a little bit of background, unlike in the first movie, but that really is the only plus point.
In my opinion, this is a sequel to a film that didn't need a sequel, so again, if you have seen the first film this might be a little boring to watch.
On the other hand, if you haven't seen the first film you might just enjoy it. Even though it is a sequel, it stands alone (as I said, it's more of a remake) and there is no need to have seen the first one.
so, if you saw the first it's 3/10
if you didn't see the first it's 6/10
So overall (and being generous) it's 5/10
This is a major problem.
In the original film there is a rather large twist at the end, and if you don't already guess it, it is a great twist. This film follows the exact same twist, so if you've seen the first, then there's not much to see here. It's basically a remake, with slightly different circumstances.
On a plus point, the baddie does have a little bit of background, unlike in the first movie, but that really is the only plus point.
In my opinion, this is a sequel to a film that didn't need a sequel, so again, if you have seen the first film this might be a little boring to watch.
On the other hand, if you haven't seen the first film you might just enjoy it. Even though it is a sequel, it stands alone (as I said, it's more of a remake) and there is no need to have seen the first one.
so, if you saw the first it's 3/10
if you didn't see the first it's 6/10
So overall (and being generous) it's 5/10
- C-Ant
- 25 ago 2008
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker
- Locaciones de filmación
- Lancaster, California, Estados Unidos(Exterior)
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 2,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 99,499
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Reeker 2 (2008) officially released in India in English?
Responda