CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.8/10
15 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Tres tenientes australianos son sometidos a un consejo de guerra por ejecutar a prisioneros como una forma de desviar la atención de los crímenes de guerra cometidos por sus oficiales superi... Leer todoTres tenientes australianos son sometidos a un consejo de guerra por ejecutar a prisioneros como una forma de desviar la atención de los crímenes de guerra cometidos por sus oficiales superiores.Tres tenientes australianos son sometidos a un consejo de guerra por ejecutar a prisioneros como una forma de desviar la atención de los crímenes de guerra cometidos por sus oficiales superiores.
- Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
- 13 premios ganados y 8 nominaciones en total
Charles 'Bud' Tingwell
- Lt. Col. Denny
- (as Charles Tingwell)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- Trivia"We shot them under Rule 303" is a reference to the.0.303 inch (7.7 millimetre) cartridge used in British Army rifles.
- ErroresIn the film, the defendants are allowed to gather in a common room until lights out to socialize and meet with their lawyer and other visitors. In reality, there were six defendants in total, including Captain Taylor, who were held in strict solitary confinement from their arrest through sentencing and were not allowed to communicate with each other at all.
- Citas
[last lines]
Harry Morant: Shoot straight, you bastards. - Don't make a mess of it!
- Créditos curiososIntroducing Lewis Fitz-Gerald as George Witton.
- Bandas sonorasAt Last
Traditional tune
Arranged by Jack Grimsley (uncredited)
Lyrics by H.H. Morant
Performed by Edward Woodward
Opinión destacada
(Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon.)
The question raised in this film is the same as that raised in the Nuremberg trials following World War II and at the trial of Lt. William Calley during the Vietnam War, namely should a soldier be punished for following orders?
The answer to that question depends not only on what the orders were--that is, were they legitimate orders consistent with the "rules of war"--but also on who is asking the question and why they are asking it. After WWII the Allies asked the question and the reason they asked it was because so many people were horrified by Nazi atrocities and wanted someone to punish. If the Axis powers had somehow won the war they might have tried US President Harry S Truman and others for the atomic bombings of the Japanese cities, or indeed for the fire bombings of Dresden. In Vietnam we asked the question of ourselves during the war because our government and military were being accused both at home and abroad of waging a unjustified war and going against our own value system.
Here the story goes back to the Boer War a hundred years ago in South Africa, as the British command for political reasons puts Lt. Breaker Morant, an Australian soldier fighting with the British forces, and two of his fellow Bushveldt Carbineers on trial for shooting Boer prisoners. Their defense is the same as the Nazi soldiers and that of Lt. Calley: they were just following orders.
The superb direction by Bruce Beresford (from the play by Kenneth Ross) makes us identify with Morant (Edward Woodward), Lt. Peter Handcock (Bryan Brown) and the third soldier because we can see that the horrors of war pervert the usual logic of right and wrong so completely that we can appreciate what drove them to do what they did. Jack Thompson, playing defense attorney Major J. F. Thomas, expresses this when he tells the court that war changes us and that therefore the usual rules of conduct no longer apply. Incidentally this film is based on actual events.
Regardless of which side of this very vexing question you come down on, I can promise you will enjoy this outstanding film, winner of 10 Australian Film Institute Awards. In the annuals of war films and courtroom dramas this ranks with the best of them.
The question raised in this film is the same as that raised in the Nuremberg trials following World War II and at the trial of Lt. William Calley during the Vietnam War, namely should a soldier be punished for following orders?
The answer to that question depends not only on what the orders were--that is, were they legitimate orders consistent with the "rules of war"--but also on who is asking the question and why they are asking it. After WWII the Allies asked the question and the reason they asked it was because so many people were horrified by Nazi atrocities and wanted someone to punish. If the Axis powers had somehow won the war they might have tried US President Harry S Truman and others for the atomic bombings of the Japanese cities, or indeed for the fire bombings of Dresden. In Vietnam we asked the question of ourselves during the war because our government and military were being accused both at home and abroad of waging a unjustified war and going against our own value system.
Here the story goes back to the Boer War a hundred years ago in South Africa, as the British command for political reasons puts Lt. Breaker Morant, an Australian soldier fighting with the British forces, and two of his fellow Bushveldt Carbineers on trial for shooting Boer prisoners. Their defense is the same as the Nazi soldiers and that of Lt. Calley: they were just following orders.
The superb direction by Bruce Beresford (from the play by Kenneth Ross) makes us identify with Morant (Edward Woodward), Lt. Peter Handcock (Bryan Brown) and the third soldier because we can see that the horrors of war pervert the usual logic of right and wrong so completely that we can appreciate what drove them to do what they did. Jack Thompson, playing defense attorney Major J. F. Thomas, expresses this when he tells the court that war changes us and that therefore the usual rules of conduct no longer apply. Incidentally this film is based on actual events.
Regardless of which side of this very vexing question you come down on, I can promise you will enjoy this outstanding film, winner of 10 Australian Film Institute Awards. In the annuals of war films and courtroom dramas this ranks with the best of them.
- DennisLittrell
- 3 may 2003
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Breaker Morant?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Breaker Morant
- Locaciones de filmación
- Cactus Farm, Burra, South Australia, Australia(deserted farmhouse, Boer attack)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- AUD 800,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 948
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the German language plot outline for 'Breaker' Morant (1980)?
Responda