Zhivye i myortvye

1964
3h 21min

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaJournalist Ivan Sintsov news of the treacherous attack by Nazi Germany during the catches of southern vacation. As a war correspondent, he becomes a witness to the difficult events of the fi... Leer todoJournalist Ivan Sintsov news of the treacherous attack by Nazi Germany during the catches of southern vacation. As a war correspondent, he becomes a witness to the difficult events of the first months of the war - many departures in 1941.Journalist Ivan Sintsov news of the treacherous attack by Nazi Germany during the catches of southern vacation. As a war correspondent, he becomes a witness to the difficult events of the first months of the war - many departures in 1941.

Dirección
- Aleksandr Stolper
Guionistas
- Konstantin Simonov
- Aleksandr Stolper
Elenco

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

7.7/10

435

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Dirección
- Aleksandr Stolper
Guionistas
- Konstantin Simonov
- Aleksandr Stolper
Elenco

3Opiniones de los usuarios

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 1 nominación en total

Fotos18

+ 13

Más como esto

7.2

Vozmezdie

8.2

La balada del soldado

7.9

Na voyne, kak na voyne

6.6

Chetvyortyy

7.9

El destino de un hombre

7.8

Proverka na dorogakh

7.5

Komissar

8.3

Cuando pasan las cigüeñas

7.2

Mujeres heroicas

7.5

Devyat dney odnogo goda

6.9

Goryachiy sneg

7.5

Sorok pervyy

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que…?

Editar

Trivia
The canonical combat film during the Thaw era in the USSR, and released toward it's end, The Living and The Dead topped the box office in both parts for 1964, with over 40 million people.

Conexiones
Featured in Legendy mirovogo kino: Oleg Efremov

Opiniones de usuarios3

Opinión

Opinión destacada

Gotta give credit to Stolper

Stolper did not take from the book to the screen a lot of Stalin-praising garbage and concentrated on the battle scenes and interactions between soldiers. Let's not forget that this was the movie that brought Papanov to national fame.

One thing that is disappointing is high degree politicizing, which was unavoidable in a 1963 Soviet movie. The second half of the book and the movie deals with how Sinzov lost his party id card and is fighting to get back the credibility and rank. Other then that the movie works.