CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.1/10
815
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaWealthy Polly Fulton marries a progressive scholar whose attitudes toward capitalism and acquired wealth puts their marriage in jeopardy.Wealthy Polly Fulton marries a progressive scholar whose attitudes toward capitalism and acquired wealth puts their marriage in jeopardy.Wealthy Polly Fulton marries a progressive scholar whose attitudes toward capitalism and acquired wealth puts their marriage in jeopardy.
- Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
- 1 nominación en total
John Albright
- Attendant
- (sin créditos)
Harlan Briggs
- Sam Hartle - the Caretaker
- (sin créditos)
Helen Brown
- B.F.'s Nurse
- (sin créditos)
Alexander Cameron
- Army Corporal - Tasmin's Jeep Driver
- (sin créditos)
Ruth Cherrington
- Sedley Guest
- (sin créditos)
Davison Clark
- Park Avenue Doorman
- (sin créditos)
James Conaty
- Man at 'Hamlet' Play
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIn Britain the letters B.F. have a vulgar connotation, so the title was changed in the U.K. to the simpler "Polly Fulton."
- ErroresWhen B.F. is talking to Brett about providing Polly with an allowance; he places his left-hand on the desk and is holding a cigar with all the fingers wrapped around it. But on the next cut after Brett agrees with Polly's allowance; the orientation of how B.F. is holding the cigar has now changed. It is now being held between the index and middle finger.
- Citas
'Apples' Sandler: You can tell how a man is doing in Washington by the amount of slander they sling at him.
- ConexionesReferenced in The Notorious Bettie Page (2005)
- Bandas sonorasThe Wedding March
(1843) (uncredited)
from "A Midsummer Night's Dream, Op.61"
Music by Felix Mendelssohn
Played as background music at Apple's and Bob's wedding
Opinión destacada
"B.F.'s Daughter" lost a lot of money at the box office and it's very easy to see why when you watch the movie. BOTH leading characters in this romantic drama are jerks in their own way....and making them both that way pretty much guarantees that the audience will dislike the film.
Polly Fulton (Barbara Stanwyck) is an odd woman. She's the daughter of a rich industrialist (Charles Coburn) and is dating a very steady, sober guy....in other words, he's a bit dull. So it's not completely understanding that she'd be infatuated with Tom Brett (Van Heflin). However, anything beyond infatuation simply makes no sense. She's a rich debutante and he's an angry guy who thinks he knows everything and eschews wealth. The fact they meet, fall in love and get married in hates indicates the marriage will be rocky. Well, initially it isn't and Tom allows Polly to do and spend what she wants of her father's money. But over time, he's resentful...resenting what he chose. In fact, both chose types totally unlike their stated philosophies and seem to spend much of the movie changing the other to be like them. I couldn't help but think that Polly marrying Tom was dumb and over time, that seems to be the case in the movie.
As I said above, I really didn't like Polly nor Tom. Both seemed self-absorbed and a bit dim when it came to the marriage. Certainly the film is anything but romantic...and isn't much fun to watch. I also strongly dislikes Keenan Wynn's character...who seems out of place in the film. Overall, a big mistake of a film due to a script that was just hopeless and unlikable.
By the way, although the film begins in 1932, the clothes and hair are strictly 1948...especially Stanwyck. This is pretty lazy and I am surprised a major studio didn't work harder to get the look right.
Polly Fulton (Barbara Stanwyck) is an odd woman. She's the daughter of a rich industrialist (Charles Coburn) and is dating a very steady, sober guy....in other words, he's a bit dull. So it's not completely understanding that she'd be infatuated with Tom Brett (Van Heflin). However, anything beyond infatuation simply makes no sense. She's a rich debutante and he's an angry guy who thinks he knows everything and eschews wealth. The fact they meet, fall in love and get married in hates indicates the marriage will be rocky. Well, initially it isn't and Tom allows Polly to do and spend what she wants of her father's money. But over time, he's resentful...resenting what he chose. In fact, both chose types totally unlike their stated philosophies and seem to spend much of the movie changing the other to be like them. I couldn't help but think that Polly marrying Tom was dumb and over time, that seems to be the case in the movie.
As I said above, I really didn't like Polly nor Tom. Both seemed self-absorbed and a bit dim when it came to the marriage. Certainly the film is anything but romantic...and isn't much fun to watch. I also strongly dislikes Keenan Wynn's character...who seems out of place in the film. Overall, a big mistake of a film due to a script that was just hopeless and unlikable.
By the way, although the film begins in 1932, the clothes and hair are strictly 1948...especially Stanwyck. This is pretty lazy and I am surprised a major studio didn't work harder to get the look right.
- planktonrules
- 26 feb 2020
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 1,745,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 48 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Spanish language plot outline for La rebelde (1948)?
Responda