CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.2/10
13 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
En la India del siglo XIX, tres soldados británicos y un aguador nativo deben detener un resurgimiento masivo secreto del culto asesino Thuggee antes de que pueda agitar toda la tierra.En la India del siglo XIX, tres soldados británicos y un aguador nativo deben detener un resurgimiento masivo secreto del culto asesino Thuggee antes de que pueda agitar toda la tierra.En la India del siglo XIX, tres soldados británicos y un aguador nativo deben detener un resurgimiento masivo secreto del culto asesino Thuggee antes de que pueda agitar toda la tierra.
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado en total
Charles Bennett
- Telegraph Operator
- (sin créditos)
Gene Coogan
- Lancer
- (sin créditos)
Jimmy Dime
- Thug
- (sin créditos)
George Du Count
- Pandu Lal
- (sin créditos)
Anna May the Elephant
- Elephant
- (sin créditos)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe gong in the title sequence is the same one used to summon King Kong six years earlier.
- ErroresBallantine and MacChesney are bound and gagged when the last Thuggee is about to behead them after Gunga Din sounds the alarm. Cutter shoots the Thuggee and Ballantine and MacChesney are unbound as they rush to Cutter's side.
- Créditos curiososThe credits appear on a gong. Standing next to the gong is a Hindu man, and every time he strikes the gong, the credits change.
- Versiones alternativasGerman theatrical version was cut by approx. 12 minutes. This version was later shown on TV but never released on any home media format. Only in 2018 the film was released on DVD, with approx. 4 minutes restored.
- ConexionesFeatured in Pasión prohibida (1959)
Opinión destacada
I have seen "Gunga Din" several times. It is not a strict re-telling of the Kipling work but a studio era take on it. It is jingoistic and hokey but it is an entertaining and uplifting film.
Those that bemoan the "un-PC" tone of the film need to look at it in context. The underlying theme of the piece is that these British soldiers come to hold a member of a group of people they had (until that time) regarded as savages, in higher regard than most of their compatriots. The ideas of universal human qualities and nobility are driven home in a very emotional, if a little ham-fisted way. Considering the racial atmosphere in America at the time, this was not exactly a statement without some daring.
To condemn this film or the original story for racism is to miss the point entirely. That was the time and for its time, the messages here are incredibly progressive. Besides, even if the film were racist, only a fool discards a classic piece of art because he or she disagrees with the content of the message. Pretty much all critics and film historians list Griffith's "Birth of a Nation" somewhere in the top 3 films of all time, regardless of the fact that the heroes of the picture are the KKK. The message was wrong but the film transformed the whole of film-making forever. Do we discard that too? Do we burn all copies of Joseph Conrad's novella "Heart of Darkness" because some perceive the narrator to be a bigot? To do so would be robbing generations of a classic example of well crafted storytelling at its best. Such behavior is ignorance in its basest form.
But, you know, that's just what I think.
Those that bemoan the "un-PC" tone of the film need to look at it in context. The underlying theme of the piece is that these British soldiers come to hold a member of a group of people they had (until that time) regarded as savages, in higher regard than most of their compatriots. The ideas of universal human qualities and nobility are driven home in a very emotional, if a little ham-fisted way. Considering the racial atmosphere in America at the time, this was not exactly a statement without some daring.
To condemn this film or the original story for racism is to miss the point entirely. That was the time and for its time, the messages here are incredibly progressive. Besides, even if the film were racist, only a fool discards a classic piece of art because he or she disagrees with the content of the message. Pretty much all critics and film historians list Griffith's "Birth of a Nation" somewhere in the top 3 films of all time, regardless of the fact that the heroes of the picture are the KKK. The message was wrong but the film transformed the whole of film-making forever. Do we discard that too? Do we burn all copies of Joseph Conrad's novella "Heart of Darkness" because some perceive the narrator to be a bigot? To do so would be robbing generations of a classic example of well crafted storytelling at its best. Such behavior is ignorance in its basest form.
But, you know, that's just what I think.
- crankyerma
- 1 ago 2004
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Gunga Din?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Aufstand in Sidi Hakim
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 1,910,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 57 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Japanese language plot outline for Gunga Din (1939)?
Responda