CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.2/10
11 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Remake de la película de 1992 sobre un par de estafadores del baloncesto que se asocian para ganar dinero extra.Remake de la película de 1992 sobre un par de estafadores del baloncesto que se asocian para ganar dinero extra.Remake de la película de 1992 sobre un par de estafadores del baloncesto que se asocian para ganar dinero extra.
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Tyler Herro
- Tyler Herro
- (as Tyler Christopher Herro)
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis movie was dedicated to the late Lance Reddick.
- ErroresIn closing credits it states, "Based on the 1991 motion picture..." when in fact it was 1992.
- ConexionesReferenced in Saturday Night Live: Jack Harlow (2022)
Opinión destacada
The original was more raw and a decent representation of the times.
The new version is also good representation of the times, but feels less raw and has Hollywood polish all over it. It's hilarious that this qualifies as an rated R movie when it seems more like a PG or G rated movie.
There were some laughs and the story was okay, but don't expect too many similarities or a connection to the original. The only thing that was similar was that there was a black and white guy that randomly team up to enter a 2 on 2 basketball tournament. Everything else was pretty different.
I wish Disney/Fox would stop remaking classics to make a quick buck off of fans. It's disappointing because they're ruining the memories people have of the original versions.
If you have nothing better to watch then it's a decent time filler, but don't dedicate your time to watching it.
I don't think it's a 1/10 rating, but it's certainly not above a 6/10 rating. I'd put it around a 3 or 4 out of 10 rating. The characters were likeable, so I went with 4.
The new version is also good representation of the times, but feels less raw and has Hollywood polish all over it. It's hilarious that this qualifies as an rated R movie when it seems more like a PG or G rated movie.
There were some laughs and the story was okay, but don't expect too many similarities or a connection to the original. The only thing that was similar was that there was a black and white guy that randomly team up to enter a 2 on 2 basketball tournament. Everything else was pretty different.
I wish Disney/Fox would stop remaking classics to make a quick buck off of fans. It's disappointing because they're ruining the memories people have of the original versions.
If you have nothing better to watch then it's a decent time filler, but don't dedicate your time to watching it.
I don't think it's a 1/10 rating, but it's certainly not above a 6/10 rating. I'd put it around a 3 or 4 out of 10 rating. The characters were likeable, so I went with 4.
- weirdg
- 19 may 2023
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is White Men Can't Jump?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- White Men Can't Jump
- Locaciones de filmación
- Venice, California, Estados Unidos(VENICEBALL tournament scenes.)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 41 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the German language plot outline for Los blancos no saben saltar (2023)?
Responda