CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.9/10
1.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaScientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.
Explorar episodios
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe three hosts started this project after their release from mythbusters over a salary dispute.
- ConexionesReferenced in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Howard & Grant (2020)
Opinión destacada
Mythbusters found out that you could not take the Build Team out of the show. Can you run a show using only the Build Team? And doing things similar to Mythbusters, without outright plagiarizing it? That's not an easy task.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
- jensstark
- 10 dic 2016
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does White Rabbit Project have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Проект Белый кролик
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución48 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for White Rabbit Project (2016)?
Responda