PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
3,9/10
1,2 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaAs an antibiotic-resistant pandemic devastates the planet, the only safe place is in the air.As an antibiotic-resistant pandemic devastates the planet, the only safe place is in the air.As an antibiotic-resistant pandemic devastates the planet, the only safe place is in the air.
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- PifiasAfter the plane lands, they're on the tarmac and the wind is blowing, but the cgi smoke from the burning buildings is drifting into the wind.
Reseña destacada
It's quite remarkable that this film was released just six years ago, as it bears a striking resemblance to the style of George A. Romero's horror films from the 1980s. The cinematography, production design, characters, and dialogue all echo Romero's iconic works and lack originality. The film features all the familiar tropes: a group of survivors escaping an infection, internal conflicts, a stubborn individual insisting on his own way, characters compromising the group's safety for personal interests, and the inevitable encounters with the infected during supply runs. These sub-themes have been seen before, suggesting that the film offers no new concepts.
The director's lack of ambition to rival films such as World War Z and 28 Days Later is commendable. These projects were in a different league, both in class and budget. Aware of his own talent and financial constraints, he likely maximized the potential of the resources available to him. Had the writing been more original and engaging, the movie might have elevated its entertainment value. The script remains lackluster, despite the plot progressing at a reasonable pace.
I didn't dislike this movie too much. It is what it is: a low-budget addition to the apocalyptic survival thriller genre. You can AVOID it.
The director's lack of ambition to rival films such as World War Z and 28 Days Later is commendable. These projects were in a different league, both in class and budget. Aware of his own talent and financial constraints, he likely maximized the potential of the resources available to him. Had the writing been more original and engaging, the movie might have elevated its entertainment value. The script remains lackluster, despite the plot progressing at a reasonable pace.
I didn't dislike this movie too much. It is what it is: a low-budget addition to the apocalyptic survival thriller genre. You can AVOID it.
- akg1249
- 6 may 2021
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Carrier?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 3.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was The Carrier (2015) officially released in India in English?
Responde