PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,4/10
62 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una sátira política sobre un grupo de agentes escépticos estadounidenses y británicos que intentan evitar una guerra entre dos países.Una sátira política sobre un grupo de agentes escépticos estadounidenses y británicos que intentan evitar una guerra entre dos países.Una sátira política sobre un grupo de agentes escépticos estadounidenses y británicos que intentan evitar una guerra entre dos países.
- Nominado para 1 premio Óscar
- 16 premios y 43 nominaciones en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesArmando Iannucci is well known for asking his actors to improvise their scenes around the script, and editing the best takes together. In one such improvised scene, James Gandolfini became angry enough to make Peter Capaldi drop out of character (he thought Gandolfini would "physically pummel me") and he asked the writers to provide him with a better come back.
- PifiasBritish outlets are seen in both the Washington hotel and United Nations scenes.
- Citas
Malcolm Tucker: Y'know, I've come across a lot of psychos, but none as fucking boring as you. You are a real boring fuck. Sorry, sorry, I know you disapprove of swearing so I'll sort that out. You are a boring F, star, star, CUNT!
- Créditos adicionalesThe film's final credits roll over a long shot of the main office. At the very end, Malcolm Tucker comes out, looks at the TV and asks, "Who let this woman out with her fucking hair like this?! On national television?! Looks like she stuck her finger in a fucking electrical socket..." before walking away.
- ConexionesFeatured in Charlie Rose: Episodio fechado 15 mayo 2009 (2009)
- Banda sonoraViolin Concerto in E Major BWV 1042 - I. Allegro
Composed by Johann Sebastian Bach
Performed by Kolja Blacher (violin) with the Kölner Kammerorchester (as Cologne Chamber Orchestra)
Conducted by Helmut Müller-Brühl
Licensed courtesy of Naxos Rights International Ltd.
Reseña destacada
I had never heard of this movie until the Oscar nominees were announced earlier this month. There among the nominees of Best Adapted Screenplay was a movie entitled "In The Loop." That was the only nomination of this film, and that made me curious about it.
That singular nomination was so right. The star of this film is most certainly the script! It is so over-the-top satiric and sarcastic. I daresay it is an incredible showcase for very innovative use of the English language. I had never heard words combined in such a bitingly funny yet incisively on-point manner.
The whole story began with a seemingly naive statement made by the clueless British Secretary of State on the radio that "war is unforeseeable" when asked about an impending US military intervention in the Middle East. This sets off a cascade of opposite reactions from both sides of the Atlantic as pro- and anti-war proponents face-off against each other with their conflicting views.
Fans of British black comedy will enjoy this film, which was apparently adapted by director Armando Iannucci from his BBC series called "The Thick of It." I do not get to watch enough British TV myself, but I really enjoyed the rapidly witty exchange of words by the characters. The excessive profanity seems so fit in this situation, I could not imagine any other words to use to replace them. They even make fun of their own profanity in one sequence. So funny.
I did not know most of the British cast but their performances are very entertaining as they brought the script to life with so much zip. Their very effective delivery makes the script work. Kudos to Peter Capaldi for his unflinching portrayal of the war-freak Malcolm. His fearless verbal assaults are sharper and deadlier than any weapon here. The American cast was more familiar with James Gandolfini there as a pacifist general, and Anna Chlumsky as an aide who wrote a controversial anti-war paper.
Overall, while this film is very good, it is definitely not for all audiences. The action here is in the words. I may not have been able to follow everything that was happening (like, what was that wall incident all about?) nor all the relentless British humor (should warrant a repeat watching), but I enjoyed myself nevertheless. You might enjoy it too.
That singular nomination was so right. The star of this film is most certainly the script! It is so over-the-top satiric and sarcastic. I daresay it is an incredible showcase for very innovative use of the English language. I had never heard words combined in such a bitingly funny yet incisively on-point manner.
The whole story began with a seemingly naive statement made by the clueless British Secretary of State on the radio that "war is unforeseeable" when asked about an impending US military intervention in the Middle East. This sets off a cascade of opposite reactions from both sides of the Atlantic as pro- and anti-war proponents face-off against each other with their conflicting views.
Fans of British black comedy will enjoy this film, which was apparently adapted by director Armando Iannucci from his BBC series called "The Thick of It." I do not get to watch enough British TV myself, but I really enjoyed the rapidly witty exchange of words by the characters. The excessive profanity seems so fit in this situation, I could not imagine any other words to use to replace them. They even make fun of their own profanity in one sequence. So funny.
I did not know most of the British cast but their performances are very entertaining as they brought the script to life with so much zip. Their very effective delivery makes the script work. Kudos to Peter Capaldi for his unflinching portrayal of the war-freak Malcolm. His fearless verbal assaults are sharper and deadlier than any weapon here. The American cast was more familiar with James Gandolfini there as a pacifist general, and Anna Chlumsky as an aide who wrote a controversial anti-war paper.
Overall, while this film is very good, it is definitely not for all audiences. The action here is in the words. I may not have been able to follow everything that was happening (like, what was that wall incident all about?) nor all the relentless British humor (should warrant a repeat watching), but I enjoyed myself nevertheless. You might enjoy it too.
- 3xHCCH
- 16 feb 2010
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is In the Loop?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- In the Loop
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Royal Festival Hall, South Bank Centre, South Bank, Lambeth, Londres, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(interiors: United Nations)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 612.650 GBP (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 2.388.804 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 191.866 US$
- 26 jul 2009
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 7.787.487 US$
- Duración1 hora 46 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was In the loop (2009) officially released in India in English?
Responde